Cited by 44Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Venlafaxine versus methylphenidate in pediatric outpatients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, double‐blind comparison trial

Zarinara, Ali‐Reza, Mohammadi, Mohammad‐Reza, Hazrati, Nazanin, Tabrizi, Mina, Rezazadeh, Shams‐Ali, Rezaie, Farzin, Akhondzadeh, Shahin·2010·Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental

Abstract

Objective The present report aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine compared to methylphenidate in children and adolescents with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Methods This was a 6-week, parallel group, randomized clinical trial. Thirty-eight patients (27 boys and 11 girls) with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of ADHD were the study population of this trial. All study subjects were randomly assigned to receive treatment using capsules of venlafaxine at doses of 50-75 mg/day depending on weight (50 mg/day for 30 kg (group 1) or methylphenidate at a dose of 20-30 mg/day depending on weight (group 2) for a 6-week double blind, randomized clinical trial. The principal measure of outcome was the Teacher and Parent Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV. Results No significant differences were observed between the two groups on the Parent and Teacher Rating Scale scores (df = 1; F = 1.77; p = 0.19 and df = 1; F = 1.64; p = 0.20, respectively). Side effects of headaches and insomnia were observed more frequently in the methylphenidate group. Conclusions The results suggest that venlafaxine may be useful for the treatment of ADHD. In addition, a tolerable side-effect profile is one of the advantages of venlafaxine in the treatment of ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hup.1148

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zarinara, A., Mohammadi, M., Hazrati, N., Tabrizi, M., Rezazadeh, S., Rezaie, F., & Akhondzadeh, S.
Affiliations
  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Roozbeh Hospital (IR)
  • Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Akhondzadeh, Shahin
Venue
Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-22
Volume
25
Issue
7-8
Pages
530-535
ISSN
  • 0885-6222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1077
OpenAlex
W2091916752
Cited by
44
References
4
Citations by year
2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
venlafaxine, methylphenidate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children with ADHD, antidepressant treatment, stimulant medication, treatment efficacy, tolerability, adverse effects, ADHD Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Venlafaxine Hydrochloride, Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Cyclohexanols, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Outpatients, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review