Cited by 46Saffron Plant Research StudiesAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderMedicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds

Crocus sativus L. Versus Methylphenidate in Treatment of Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind Pilot Study

Open access
Baziar, Sara, Aqamolaei, Ali, Khadem, Ebrahim, Mortazavi, Seyyed Hosein, Naderi, Sina, Sahebolzamani, Erfan, Mortezaei, Amirhosein, Jalilevand, Shakiba +3 more·2019·Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common neuropsychiatric disorders of childhood and adolescence. About 30% of patients do not respond to stimulants or cannot tolerate their side effects. Thus, alternative medication, like herbal medicine, should be considered. The aim of this trial is to compare the safety and efficacy of Crocus sativus (saffron) versus methylphenidate in improving symptoms of children with ADHD. METHODS: In a 6-week randomized double-blind study, 54 patients (children 6-17 years old) with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of ADHD were randomly assigned to receive either 20-30 mg/d (20 mg/d for <30 kg and 30 mg/d for >30 kg) methylphenidate (MPH) or 20-30 mg/d saffron capsules depending on weight (20 mg/d for <30 kg and 30 mg/d for >30 kg). Symptoms were assessed using the Teacher and Parent Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) at baseline and weeks 3 and 6. RESULTS: Fifty patients completed the trial. General linear model repeated measures showed no significant difference between the two groups on Parent and Teacher Rating Scale scores (F = 0.749, df = 1.317, p = 0.425, and F = 0.249, df = 1.410, p = 0.701, respectively). Changes in Teacher and Parent ADHD Rating Scale scores from baseline to the study end were not significantly different between the saffron group and the MPH group (p = 0.731 and p = 0.883, respectively). The frequency of adverse effects was similar between saffron and MPH groups. CONCLUSION: Short-term therapy with saffron capsule showed the same efficacy compared with methylphenidate. Nevertheless, larger controlled studies with longer treatment periods are necessary for future studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cap.2018.0146

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

3 of 21 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingown data

    The responder rate (at least 40% decrease in Parent ADHD Rating Scale scores) was not significantly different between saffron and MPH groups (saffron 100%, MPH 96%, p=1.000).

    “The responder rate (defined by at least 40% decrease in Parent ADHD Rating Scale scores between the baseline and the endpoint) was not significant between saffron and MPH groups (saffron: 100%, 25 of 25, and MPH 96%, 24 of 25; Fisher's exact test p-value = 1.000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    There was no significant difference in baseline Teacher ADHD-RS-IV total scores between the saffron and MPH groups (24.16 vs 23.64, p=0.824).

    “There was no significant difference in baseline Teacher ADHD-RS-IV total scores between the saffron and the MPH groups (24.16 -8.32 vs. 23.64 -8.16, respectively, MD [95% CI] = 0.52 [-4.16 to 5.20], t = -0.223,df = 48, p = 0.824).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The responder rate (at least 40% decrease in Teacher ADHD Rating Scale scores) was not significantly different between saffron and MPH groups (saffron 52%, MPH 56%, p=0.777).

    “There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the responder rate defined by at least 40% decrease in Teacher ADHD Rating Scale scores (saffron: 52%, 13 of 25, and MPH 56%, 14 of 25; p = 0.777).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    General linear model repeated measures showed no significant time × treatment interaction for Teacher ADHD-RS-IV scores (F=0.249, df=1.410, p=0.701).

    “General linear model repeated measures showed no significant effect for treatment (between-subject factor; F = 0.117, df = 1, p = 0.734) and time • treatment interaction (Greenhouse-Geisser corrected: F = 0.249, df = 1.410, p = 0.701) (Fig. 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    General linear model repeated measures showed no significant effect for treatment (between-subject factor) on Parent ADHD Rating Scale scores (F=0.672, df=1, p=0.416).

    “General linear model repeated measures showed no significant effect for treatment (between-subject factor; F = 0.672, df = 1, p = 0.416).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
  • May combine two claims. 17
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Methylphenidate is the most common prescribed drug for treatment of ADHD and can improve cognitive function through a dopaminergic effect.

    “The most common prescribed drug for treatment of ADHD is methylphenidate (MPH) and it is believed that it can improve cognitive function through a dopaminergic effect (Storebø et al. 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Storebø et al. 2015 source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) calls methylphenidate globally the most common drug treatment for ADHD. The Results and Discussion report possible improvements in ADHD symptoms and general behaviour in children and adolescents, but do not establish improved cognitive function through a dopaminergic effect; searches for that mechanism found only related reference titles. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The diagnosis of ADHD was confirmed by the participant's child psychiatrist based on DSM-5 criteria, the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime diagnostic interview, and a thorough medical evaluation.

    “Before entry, the diagnosis of ADHD was confirmed by the participant's child psychiatrist based on the DSM-5 criteria for ADHD, the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders, and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime diagnostic interview and a thorough medical evaluation was performed (Ghanizadeh et al. 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ghanizadeh et al. 2006 source

      The Methods > Measure passage identifies K-SADS-PL as a diagnostic interview that covers ADHD, supporting the citation’s use for the instrument. But it says the interview is based on DSM-IV criteria, not DSM-5, and the paper does not establish that the citing study’s participants received the stated psychiatric confirmation or thorough medical evaluation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Saffron was more effective than placebo therapy and could be compared with conventional antidepressants like fluoxetine and imipramine.

    “In addition, saffron was more effective than placebo therapy and could be compared with conventional antidepressants like fluoxetine and imipramine (Akhondzadeh et al. 2004(Akhondzadeh et al. , 2005;;Akhondzadeh Basti et al. 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Akhondzadeh et al. 2004 source

      The Discussion reports that saffron was similarly effective to imipramine in this small trial of mild to moderate depression, and the Results found no significant difference between the groups. The Discussion explicitly notes the lack of a placebo group; this paper also did not compare saffron with fluoxetine. It therefore supports the imipramine comparison, but not the placebo or fluoxetine parts of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Akhondzadeh et al. 2005 source
    • cites Akhondzadeh Basti et al. 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both treatments significantly improved Parent ADHD Rating Scale scores (p<0.001 for both saffron and MPH groups).

    “Moreover, a significant effect of both treatments on improving Parent ADHD Rating Scale scores was demonstrated ( p < 0.001 for both saffron and MPH groups).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No serious adverse event was observed in any of the patients and all noticed adverse effects were mild to moderate and tolerable.

    “No serious adverse event was observed in any of the patients and all noticed adverse effects were mild to moderate and tolerable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    No significant difference was observed on the score reductions of the Teacher ADHD Rating Scale at week 6 compared with baseline between the two groups (p=0.883).

    “was observed on the score reductions of the Teacher ADHD Rating Scale at week 6 compared with baseline in the two groups ( p = 0.883).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The patients, physicians who evaluated them and prescribed medications, and the statistician were all blind to allocation.

    “The patients, physicians who evaluated them and prescribed medications, and the statistician were all blind to allocation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study population size was small and the short follow-up period should also be considered.

    “The study population size was small and the short follow-up period should also be considered.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Written informed consent was obtained from each patient's parent or legal guardian.

    “After a complete description of the procedures and the purpose of the study, a written informed consent was obtained from each patient's parent or legal guardian.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Patients were randomized by the permuted block method using a computerized random number generator (allocation ratio 1:1, blocks of 4).

    “Patients were randomized by the permuted block method using a computerized random number generator (allocation ratio 1:1, blocks of 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Saffron is generally a safe medication but there are some reports of adverse effects, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and bleeding after high-dose saffron use.

    “It is generally a safe medication but there are some reports of some adverse effects, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and bleeding after high-dose saffron use (Schmidt et al. 2007;Modaghegh et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Schmidt et al. 2007 source
    • cites Modaghegh et al. 2008 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    C. sativus was safe and showed equally or lesser adverse effects compared with methylphenidate.

    “Also C. sativus was safe and showed equally or lesser adverse effects.”
    • Also stated in: § Clinical Significance · plain
      “Also C. sativus was safe and showed equal or lesser adverse effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The results of this study must be considered as preliminary.

    “The results of this study must be considered as preliminary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    About 30% of children with ADHD do not respond to methylphenidate, and its side effects have forced patients to give up their therapy period.

    “In addition, *30% of children with ADHD do not respond to methylphenidate, and its side effects has forced patients to give up their therapy period (Spencer et al. 1996).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Spencer et al. 1996 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and was consistent with the Declaration of Helsinki.

    “The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Grant No. 32600) and was in consistence with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent revisions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Antidepressants have been reported to be effective in improving ADHD symptoms.

    “Among these medications, antidepressants are used and have been reported to be effective in improving ADHD symptoms (Banaschewski et al. 2004;Zarinara et al. 2010;Salardini et al. 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Banaschewski et al. 2004 source
    • cites Zarinara et al. 2010 source
    • cites Salardini et al. 2016 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The trial was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial conducted over 6 weeks.

    “A single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial conducted over 6 weeks from January 2017 to October 2018 at the outpatient child and adolescent psychiatry clinics at Roozbeh Psychiatric Hospital (affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences).”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “In a 6-week randomized double-blind study, 54 patients (children 6-17 years old) with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of ADHD were randomly assigned to receive either 20-30 mg/d (20 mg/d for <30 kg and 30 mg/d for >30 kg) methylphenidate (MPH) or 20-30 mg/d saffron capsules depending on weight (20 mg/d for <30 kg and 30 mg/d for >30 kg).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT201701131556N94).

    “The trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (registration No. IRCTID: IRCT201701131556N94).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Fifty patients completed the trial (25 in each group).

    “Finally, 50 patients (25 patients in each group) completed the trial (Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Saffron and its active constituents can increase the reuptake inhibition of dopamine and norepinephrine and are NMDA receptor antagonists and GABA-a agonists.

    “It is thought that saffron and its active constituents can increase the reuptake inhibition of dopamine and norepinephrine and are N-methyl D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonists and GABA-a agonists.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Sarris 2007 source
    • cites Alavizadeh and Hosseinzadeh 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Different animal studies have shown that saffron and its products can improve sexual activity, reduce blood pressure, and enhance learning and memory in addition to their anticonvulsant, anti-Alzheimer, antidepressant, antischizophrenia, anti-Parkinson, and neuroprotective effects.

    “Different animal studies have also shown that saffron and its products can improve sexual activity, reduce blood pressure, and enhance learning and memory in addition to their anticonvulsant, anti-Alzheimer, antidepressant, antischizophrenia, anti-Parkinson, and neuroprotective effects (Khazdair et al. 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Khazdair et al. 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Saffron is a putative antidepressant and antidepressant agents are acceptable for treatment of ADHD.

    “Taken together, since saffron is a ''putative'' antidepressant and antidepressant agents are acceptable for treatment of ADHD, we hypothesized that saffron intake would be of benefit in these patients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The ADHD-RS-IV has been used extensively in Iran and offers valid measurement of attention and behavioral problems in school-age children.

    “The ADHD-RS-IV has been used extensively in Iran and offers valid measurement of attention and behavioral problems in school-age children (Amiri et al. 2008;Abbasi et al. 2011;Jafarinia et al. 2012;Salardini et al. 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Amiri et al. 2008 source
    • cites Abbasi et al. 2011 source
    • cites Jafarinia et al. 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Evidence has proven that saffron can be useful in disorders involving memory and learning disorders like Alzheimer's disease.

    “Evidence has proven that saffron can be useful in disorders involving the memory and learning disorders like Alzheimer's disease (Akhondzadeh et al. 2009;Moshiri et al. 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Akhondzadeh et al. 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Moshiri et al. 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Assuming a mean difference of 3 on the Teacher and Parent ADHD Rating Scale, an SD of 3, a power of 90%, and a two-tailed significance level of 0.05, a sample size of 46 was calculated; with prediction of 10% attrition rate, 50 patients were needed (25 in each group).

    “Assuming a mean difference (MD) of 3 on the Teacher and Parent ADHD Rating Scale, an SD of 3 on the Teacher and Parent ADHD Rating Scale (according to the pilot study), a power of 90%, and a two-tailed significance level of 0.05, a sample size of 46 was calculated.With prediction of 10% attrition rate, 50 patients were needed (25 in each group).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
25 of 25
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a lack of clinical research on the utilization of saffron in ADHD.

    “Given these data and lack of clinical research on utilization of saffron in ADHD, we conducted a ''randomized, double-blind pilot clinical trial'' to compare the efficacy and safety of saffron capsules with a commonly used stimulant medication (methylphenidate) in children who were suffering from ADHD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    This randomized, double-blind study is the first to be published on the effects of saffron extract for treatment of ADHD in comparison to a stimulant.

    “To the best of our knowledge, this randomized, double-blind study is the first to be published on the effects of saffron extract for treatment of ADHD in comparison to a stimulant; therefore, it is not possible to draw any comparisons with other clinical studies.”
2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • Methylphenidate teacher scores do not sum at week 6

    Minor

    The methylphenidate group's week-6 teacher subscale means sum to 14.16, not the reported total mean of 14.4.

    Reported 14.4 · recomputed 14.16

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baziar, S., Aqamolaei, A., Khadem, E., Mortazavi, S. H., Naderi, S., Sahebolzamani, E., Mortezaei, A., Jalilevand, S., Mohammadi, M.-R., Shahmirzadi, M., & Akhondzadeh, S.
Affiliations
  • Roozbeh Hospital (IR)
  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Akhondzadeh, Shahin
Venue
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Published
2019-04
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
205-212
ISSN
  • 1044-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8992
OpenAlex
W2913509687
Cited by
46
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Saffron Plant Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
Keywords
saffron, methylphenidate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, herbal medicine, ADHD symptom severity, ADHD-RS-IV, adverse effects
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Crocus, Herbal Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review