The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human psychopharmacology of Ecstasy (MDMA): a review of 15 years of empirical research
Abstract
MDMA (3,4‐methylenedioxymethamphetamine) or ‘Ecstasy’ was scheduled as an illegal drug in 1986, but since then its recreational use has increased dramatically. This review covers 15 years of research into patterns of use, its acute psychological and physiological effects, and the long‐term consequences of repeated use. MDMA is an indirect monoaminergic agonist, stimulating the release and inhibiting the reuptake of serotonin (5‐HT) and, to a lesser extent, other neurotransmitters. Single doses of MDMA have been administered to human volunteers in double‐blind placebo‐controlled trials, although most findings are based upon recreational MDMA users. The ‘massive’ boost in neurotransmitter activity can generate intense feelings of elation and pleasure, also hyperactivity and hyperthermia. This psychophysiological arousal may be exacerbated by high ambient temperatures, overcrowding, prolonged dancing and other stimulant drugs. Occasionally the ‘serotonin syndrome’ reactions may prove fatal. In the days after Ecstasy use, around 80% of users report rebound depression and lethargy, due probably to monoaminergic depletion. Dosage escalation and chronic pharmacodynamic tolerance typically occur in regular users. Repeated doses of MDMA cause serotonergic neurotoxicity in laboratory animals, and there is extensive evidence for long‐term neuropsychopharmacological damage in humans. Abstinent regular Ecstasy users often display reduced levels of 5‐HT, 5‐HIAA, tryptophan hydroxylase and serotonin transporter density; functional deficits in learning/memory, higher cognitive processing, sleep, appetite and psychiatric well‐being, and, most paradoxically, ‘loss of sexual interest/pleasure’. These psychobiological deficits are greatest in heavy Ecstasy users and may reflect serotonergic axonal loss in the higher brain regions, especially the frontal lobes, temporal lobes and hippocampus. These problems seem to remain long after the recreational use of Ecstasy has ceased, suggesting that the neuropharmacological damage may be permament. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toxicity and deaths from 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("ecstasy")
Henry, J. A., Jeffreys, K. J., & Dawling, S. (1992) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(92)91469-o · Cited by 729
McCann, U., Szabo, Z., Scheffel, U., Dannals, R., & Ricaurte, G. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)04329-3 · Cited by 660
Neurotoxicity of the psychedelic amphetamine, methylenedioxymethamphetamine.
Schmidt, C. J. (1987) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(25)22673-8 · Cited by 529
Alcohol and drug use in UK university students
Webb, E., Ashton, C., Kelly, P., & Kamali, F. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03410-1 · Cited by 472
Vollenweider, F. X., Gamma, A., Liechti, M., & Huber, T. (1998) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(98)00013-x · Cited by 448
Does cigarette smoking cause stress?
Parrott, A. C. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.10.817 · Cited by 447
Self-citationGreen, A. R., Cross, A. J., & Goodwin, G. M. (1995) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02246288 · Cited by 415
Subjective Reports of the Effects of MDMA in a Clinical Setting
Greer, G., & Tolbert, R. (1986) · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs · doi:10.1080/02791072.1986.10472364 · Cited by 413
Recreational MDMA use in Sydney: a profile of ‘Ecstasy’ users and their experiences with the drug
SOLOWIJ, N., HALL, W., & LEE, N. (1992) · British Journal of Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb02003.x · Cited by 413
Non‐linear pharmacokinetics of MDMA (‘ecstasy’) in humans
De La Torre, R., Farré, M., Ortuño, J., Mas, M., Brenneisen, R., Roset, P. N., Segura, J., & Camí, J. (2000) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00121.x · Cited by 401
Cited by
The neurobiology and control of anxious states
Millan, M. J. (2003) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(03)00087-x · Cited by 965
Psychobiology of Altered States of Consciousness.
Vaitl, D., Birbaumer, N., Gruzelier, J., Jamieson, G. A., Kotchoubey, B., Kübler, A., Lehmann, D., Miltner, W. H. R., Ott, U., Pütz, P., et al. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.98 · Cited by 448
Psychedelics in Psychiatry: Neuroplastic, Immunomodulatory, and Neurotransmitter Mechanisms
Inserra, A., De Gregorio, D., & Gobbi, G. (2021) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pharmrev.120.000056 · Cited by 232
A review of acute effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine in healthy volunteers
Dumont, G. J. H., & Verkes, R. J. (2006) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881106063271 · Cited by 149
The neuropsychology of ecstasy (MDMA) use: a quantitative review.
Zakzanis, K. K., Campbell, Z., & Jovanovski, D. (2007) · Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental · doi:10.1002/hup.873 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Parrott, A. C.
- Venue
- Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 557-577
- ISSN
- 0885-6222 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1077
- OpenAlex
- W2051226001
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 111
- FWCI
- 27.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human psychopharmacology of Ecstasy (MDMA): a review of 15 years of empirical research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hup.351
- The paper
- Parrott, A. C. (2001). Human psychopharmacology of Ecstasy (MDMA): a review of 15 years of empirical research. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental. https://doi.org/10.1002/hup.351
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.