Cited by 149Psychedelics and Drug StudiesForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

A review of acute effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine in healthy volunteers

Dumont, G. J. H., Verkes, R. J.·2006·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

This review of the literature aims to identify the acute effects of MDMA (ecstasy) in healthy volunteers. The wide range of relevant but methodologically diverse tests was .rst grouped into clusters to allow an evaluation of tests that would otherwise have been excluded due to their low frequency of utilization. The following three types of tests were evaluated: (1) functional tests quantifying executive, attention, visual, motor, visuomotor and auditory functions, (2) phenomenological tests assessing personal, subjective experiences, and (3) physiological measures re.ecting neurophysiological, endocrine and physiological parameters. MDMA showed robust effects on most of the phenomenological and physiological tests. Functional tests were scarce, preventing any meaningful conclusions to be drawn from their evaluation other than that these tests should be incorporated into future acute-effect studies. A striking doseñresponse relationship appeared for cardiovascular effects. At doses below 1.0 mg/kg MDMA no change was observed relative to placebo while above this dose all studies reported signi.cant increases. Furthermore, pupil size, plasma cortisol and plasma prolactin levels proved responsive to MDMA administration. The reported subjective effects of MDMA matched the entactogenic profile. Although interest in the action of MDMA is considerable, the existing knowledge about the cognitive effects of MDMA in humans is still rather limited and further research into the drug's effects is recommended, also in view of potential therapeutic uses of the drug.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881106063271

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dumont, G. J. H., & Verkes, R. J.
Affiliations
Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2006-03
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
176-187
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2118539399
Cited by
149
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
MDMA, ecstasy, acute drug effects, healthy volunteers, dose-response relationship, cardiovascular effects, pupil size, plasma cortisol, prolactin, subjective effects, cognitive effects, executive function, attention, motor function, visuomotor function, auditory function
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Arousal, Brain, Clinical Trials as Topic, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Hallucinogens, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Reference Values, Serotonin Agents, N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review