The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of urbanization on streamflow in the Atlanta area (Georgia, USA): a comparative hydrological approach
Abstract
For the period from 1958 to 1996, streamflow characteristics of a highly urbanized watershed were compared with less‐urbanized and non‐urbanized watersheds within a 20 000 km 2 region in the vicinity of Atlanta, Georgia: in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge physiographic provinces of the southeastern USA. Water levels in several wells completed in surficial and crystalline‐rock aquifers were also evaluated. Data were analysed for seven US Geological Survey (USGS) stream gauges, 17 National Weather Service rain gauges, and five USGS monitoring wells. Annual runoff coefficients (RCs; runoff as a fractional percentage of precipitation) for the urban stream (Peachtree Creek) were not significantly greater than for the less‐urbanized watersheds. The RCs for some streams were similar to others and the similar streams were grouped according to location. The RCs decreased from the higher elevation and higher relief watersheds to the lower elevation and lower relief watersheds: values were 0·54 for the two Blue Ridge streams, 0·37 for the four middle Piedmont streams (near Atlanta), and 0·28 for a southern Piedmont stream. For the 25 largest stormflows, the peak flows for Peachtree Creek were 30% to 100% greater than peak flows for the other streams. The storm recession period for the urban stream was 1–2 days less than that for the other streams and the recession was characterized by a 2‐day storm recession constant that was, on average, 40 to 100% greater, i.e. streamflow decreased more rapidly than for the other streams. Baseflow recession constants ranged from 35 to 40% lower for Peachtree Creek than for the other streams; this is attributed to lower evapotranspiration losses, which result in a smaller change in groundwater storage than in the less‐urbanized watersheds. Low flow of Peachtree Creek ranged from 25 to 35% less than the other streams, possibly the result of decreased infiltration caused by the more efficient routing of stormwater and the paving of groundwater recharge areas. The timing of daily or monthly groundwater‐level fluctuations was similar annually in each well, reflecting the seasonal recharge. Although water‐level monitoring only began in the 1980s for the two urban wells, water levels displayed a notable decline compared with non‐urban wells since then; this is attributed to decreased groundwater recharge in the urban watersheds due to increased imperviousness and related rapid storm runoff. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscapes
Meyer, J. L., Paul, M. J., & Taulbee, W. K. (2005) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.1899/04-021.1 · Cited by 747
Restoring streams in an urbanizing world
BERNHARDT, E. S., & PALMER, M. A. (2007) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01718.x · Cited by 525
Land-Use Change and Hydrologic Processes: A Major Focus for the Future
DeFries, R., & Eshleman, K. N. (2004) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.5584 · Cited by 516
Dey, P., & Mishra, A. (2017) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.014 · Cited by 484
Hydrologic shortcomings of conventional urban stormwater management and opportunities for reform
Burns, M. J., Fletcher, T. D., Walsh, C. J., Ladson, A. R., & Hatt, B. E. (2012) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.012 · Cited by 450
Stream Temperature Surges Under Urbanization and Climate Change: Data, Models, and Responses 1
Nelson, K. C., & Palmer, M. A. (2007) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00034.x · Cited by 319
Modeling flood reduction effects of low impact development at a watershed scale
Ahiablame, L., & Shakya, R. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.036 · Cited by 317
Townsend, P. A., Helmers, D. P., Kingdon, C. C., McNeil, B. E., de Beurs, K. M., & Eshleman, K. N. (2009) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2008.08.012 · Cited by 286
Lin, B., Chen, X., Yao, H., Chen, Y., Liu, M., Gao, L., & James, A. (2015) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.031 · Cited by 257
Askarizadeh, A., Rippy, M. A., Fletcher, T. D., Feldman, D. L., Peng, J., Bowler, P., Mehring, A. S., Winfrey, B. K., Vrugt, J. A., AghaKouchak, A., et al. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01635 · Cited by 162
Jarden, K. M., Jefferson, A. J., & Grieser, J. M. (2016) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.10736 · Cited by 139
Fanelli, R., Prestegaard, K., & Palmer, M. (2017) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.11266 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Rose, S., & Peters, N. E.
- Venue
- Hydrological Processes
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-05-25
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1441-1457
- ISSN
- 0885-6087 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1085
- OpenAlex
- W1973747196
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.