Cited by 40Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesSoil and Unsaturated Flow

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Modelling of stormwater biofilters under random hydrologic variability: a case study of a car park at Monash University, Victoria (Australia)

Daly, E., Deletic, A., Hatt, B. E., Fletcher, T. D.·2012·Hydrological Processes

Abstract

Biofiltration systems represent an effective technology for the management of urban stormwater runoff volumes and quality. The performance of these systems, although largely dependent on their physical characteristics, is also strongly affected by the natural variability of runoff occurrence and volumes. This article presents a model that describes the statistical behaviour of the main variables involved in the water balance of a biofiltration system, given its main physical properties (filter media and vegetation types) and accounting for the natural inflow variability in terms of occurrence and water volumes. The model permits the analytical derivation of the long‐term (e.g. annual) probability density function of the soil water content in the filter media and the estimation of the main statistics of water fluxes, that is, outflow, evapotranspiration and overflow. By relating the soil water content in the filter media before inflow events to the outflow total nitrogen concentrations, the model also gives estimates of the statistics of nitrogen removal performance as a function of inflow variability. The model was tested against field data collected at a stormwater biofiltration system in Melbourne, Australia. The model could be used to rapidly assess the hydrologic and nitrogen treatment performance of alternative applications of biofiltration for stormwater management across a range of climates. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hyp.8397

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Benjamin JR, 1970, Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers
  2. 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01718.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.watres.2009.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.watres.2008.06.009 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.023 · DOI
  6. Cox DR, 1965, The theory of stochastic processes
  7. CRCCH, 2005, Model for Urban Stormwater Improvement Conceptualisation (MUSIC) Version 3
  8. 10.1029/2005WR004606 · DOI
  9. 10.1029/2008GL036933 · DOI
  10. 10.1021/es053327e · DOI
  11. 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:2(90) · DOI
  12. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2009)135:3(109) · DOI
  13. 10.2175/106143001X138624 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z · DOI
  15. FAWB, 2009, Guidelines for Filter Media in Biofiltration Systems
  16. 10.2166/wst.2007.751 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.001 · DOI
  18. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:6(600) · DOI
  19. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2008)134:5(403) · DOI
  20. 10.2175/106143003X141169 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0309-1708(01)00005-7 · DOI
  22. Leopold LB, 1968, Hydrology for urban land planning: A guidebook on the hydrological effects of urban land use, 18
  23. 10.1002/hyp.7938 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/hyp.6732 · DOI
  25. 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(352) · DOI
  26. 10.1002/hyp.7373 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0309-1708(01)00006-9 · DOI
  28. Rauch W, 2007, KAREN—User Manual
  29. 10.1080/15226510902767114 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.036 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Wong THF, 2006, Australian Runoff Quality: A Guide To Water Sensitive Urban Design
  32. ZingerY FletcherTD DeleticA.2007.The effect of various intermittent dry‐wet cycles of nitrogen removal capacity in biofiltration systems.13th International Rainwater catchment Systems Conference and 5th International Water Sensitive Urban Design Conference Sydney Australia.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
Daly, E., Deletic, A., Hatt, B. E., & Fletcher, T. D.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Department of Civil Engineering, Centre for Water Sensitive Cities Monash University Clayton Victoria 3800 Australia
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Daly, E.
Venue
Hydrological Processes
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-24
Volume
26
Issue
22
Pages
3416-3424
ISSN
  • 0885-6087 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1085
OpenAlex
W1548904075
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Hydrological Processes (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Keywords
stormwater biofilters, urban stormwater management, hydrological variability, inflow variability, soil moisture, probability density function, nitrogen removal, evapotranspiration, overflow, water balance modeling, filter media, vegetation types

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review