The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Importance of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis
Abstract
Treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) has traditionally focused on improving symptoms, with the main objective of inducing and maintaining symptomatic remission. However, new evidence suggests that concentrating exclusively on clinical outcome measures may not be adequate to achieve long-term treatment success. Indeed, physicians should also be assessing the reduction of endoscopic activity, with the intention of achieving complete mucosal healing (defined as the absence of all mucosal ulceration, both microscopic and macroscopic, providing a sigmoidoscopy score of 0, as assessed on the Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index). As a consequence of the customary reliance on symptomatic outcome measures, relatively few clinical trials have used mucosal healing or a composite including mucosal healing as a primary endpoint. This situation may soon change as new guidelines recommend the incorporation of mucosal healing into the primary endpoint of all new clinical trials in patients with UC. These recommendations are derived, in part, from data that have illustrated a correlation between mucosal healing and several important factors including long-term remission rates, disease-related complications (e.g., risk of colorectal cancer), healthcare utilization (e.g., need for colectomy), and patient quality of life. We already have drugs available to us that can effectively induce and maintain complete mucosal healing over long periods of time. This review evaluates the effect of medical therapy on mucosal healing in patients with UC and explores the importance of this outcome measure, both from the patient's perspective and clinical trial experience. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2009.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mucosal Healing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results From a Norwegian Population-Based Cohort
Frøslie, K. F., Jahnsen, J., Moum, B. A., & Vatn, M. H. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.05.051 · Cited by 1,121
Cited by
Bryant, R. V., Winer, S., SPL, T., & Riddell, R. H. (2014) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2014.08.011 · Cited by 300
Inhibition of the prostaglandin-degrading enzyme 15-PGDH potentiates tissue regeneration
Zhang, Y., Desai, A., Yang, S. Y., Bae, K. B., Antczak, M. I., Fink, S. P., Tiwari, S., Willis, J. E., Williams, N. S., Dawson, D. M., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa2340 · Cited by 297
Colon capsule endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline
Spada, C., Hassan, C., Galmiche, J., Neuhaus, H., Dumonceau, J., Adler, S., Epstein, O., Gay, G., Pennazio, M., Rex, D., et al. (2012) · Endoscopy · doi:10.1055/s-0031-1291717 · Cited by 287
Poole, C. D., Connolly, M. P., Nielsen, S. K., Currie, C. J., & Marteau, P. (2010) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2009.11.010 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Lichtenstein, G. R., & Rutgeerts, P.
- Venue
- Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 338-346
- ISSN
- 1078-0998 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024121629
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Importance of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ibd.20997
- The paper
- Lichtenstein, G. R., & Rutgeerts, P. (2010). Importance of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1002/ibd.20997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.