Cited by 21Youth, Politics, and SocietyYouth Development and Social SupportElectoral Systems and Political Participation

Understanding the costs and benefits of politics among adolescents within a sociocultural context

Open access
Oosterhoff, Benjamin, Poppler, Ashleigh, Hill, Ryan M., Fitzgerald, Holly, Shook, Natalie J.·2022·Infant and Child Development

Abstract

Politics entails personal costs and benefits, which may differ for youth from different sociocultural backgrounds. The at‐stake hypothesis proposes that politically marginalized youth experience greater costs (e.g., stress, conflict) and benefits (e.g., empowerment) related to politics, whereas the at‐risk hypothesis proposes that politically marginalized youth experience greater costs but lower benefits. In Study 1, we examined the factor structure of a new political costs and benefits measure among youth (N = 1,056,Mage = 15.91 years) and tested mental health and demographic correlates. Consistent with the at‐stake hypothesis, marginalized youth experienced greater political costs and benefits than non‐marginalized youth, although findings were nuanced. In Study 2, a sub‐sample of participants (N = 191,Mage = 16.05 years) were recontacted from Study 1 to provide written explanations for why specific findings emerged. Adolescents' reasons indicated that laws and policies disproportionately affect youth from marginalized populations, thus producing both negative and positive political experiences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/icd.2280

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals from marginalized backgrounds face greater political costs (e.g., stress) but also benefits (e.g., empowerment) in relation to politics.

    “face greater political costs (e.g., stress) but also benefits (e.g., empowerment) in relation to politics (Oosterhoff et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oosterhoff, B., Poppler, A., Hill, R. M., Fitzgerald, H., & Shook, N. J.
Affiliations
  • Montana State University (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Oosterhoff, Benjamin
Venue
Infant and Child Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-11-11
Volume
31
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1522-7219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-7227
OpenAlex
W4225751513
Cited by
21
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infant and Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • Montana State University ScholarWorks (Montana State University) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth, Politics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
political participation, adolescents, political exclusion, youth mental health, sociocultural background, political empowerment, political stress, political conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review