Cited by 187LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender and Feminist StudiesGender, Sexuality, and Education

A Comparison of Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual College Undergraduate Women on Selected Mental Health Issues

Kerr, Dianne L., Santurri, Laura, Peters, Patricia·2013·Journal of American College Health

Abstract

Objective To investigate selected mental health characteristics of lesbians and bisexual undergraduate college women as compared with heterosexual college women. Participants Self-identified lesbians and bisexual and heterosexual female college students who took part in the American College Health Association National College Health Assessment II (ACHA-NCHA-II) in Fall 2008, Spring 2009, and Fall 2009. Methods A secondary analysis of the ACHA-NCHA-II data set for 3 semesters was conducted. Comparisons of lesbians and bisexual and heterosexual female college students were made. Results Bisexual women reported the worst mental health status in all areas studied including anxiety, anger, depressive symptoms, self-injury, and suicidal ideation and attempts. Both bisexual women and lesbians had a far greater likelihood of having these mental health issues when compared with heterosexual women. Lesbians and bisexual women utilized significantly more mental health services (with the exception of clergy) than heterosexual women. Conclusions College health professionals should recognize and address the mental health needs of bisexual and lesbian undergraduate college women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07448481.2013.787619

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The elevated odds of disorder among students with non-heterosexual orientations are consistent with previous studies of sexual orientation and mental health among college students.

    “the elevated odds of disorder among students with non-heterosexual orientations are consistent with previous studies of the association between sexual orientation and mental health among college students (Kerr, Santurri, & Peters, 2013; Kisch, Leino, & Silverman, 2005; Oswalt & Wyatt, 2011; Przedworski et al., 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kerr, D. L., Santurri, L., & Peters, P.
Affiliations
Kent State University (US)
Venue
Journal of American College Health
Published
2013-05
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
185-194
ISSN
  • 0164-4300 (ISSN-L)
  • 0744-8481
  • 1940-3208
OpenAlex
W1998396143
Cited by
187
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
26.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of American College Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
Keywords
lesbians, bisexual women, heterosexual women, female university students, mental health, anxiety, depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, self-harm, anger, mental health service utilization, sexual orientation differences, campus health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anger, Anxiety, Bisexuality, Depression, Female, Humans, Mental Health, Socioeconomic Factors, Students, Universities, Self-Injurious Behavior, Homosexuality, Female, Heterosexuality, Racial Groups, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review