Cited by 120Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceBayesian Methods and Mixture Models

The potential of growth mixture modelling

Open access
Muthén, Bengt·2006·Infant and Child Development

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/icd.482

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Growth mixture modeling is a statistical method designed to identify classes of individuals who are homogeneous in terms of their longitudinal change in a set of variables of interest.

    “Growth mixture modeling (GMM) is a statistical method designed to identify classes of 90 individuals who are homogeneous in terms of their longitudinal change in a set of 91 variables of interest (Muthén, 2006; Ram and Grimm, 2009).”

    From Time in treatment: Examining mental illness trajectories across inpatient psychiatric treatment (2020) · cites this paper as Muthén, 2006

    In “Not GMM Versus LCGA, but Both in a General Latent Variable Framework” (page not provided), Muthén describes GMM as modelling trajectory classes. But the paper explicitly says GMM allows within-class variation, so describing individuals in a class as homogeneous in their longitudinal change overstates what the method assumes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Brown, E. C., Catalano, C. B., Fleming, C. B., Haggerty, K. P., & Abbot, R. D. (2004). Adolescent substance use outcomes in the Raising Healthy Children Project: A two-part latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, in press.
  2. Muthe ´n, B. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modelling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345-368). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  3. Nagin, D. S., & Tremblay, R. (2005). Developmental trajectory groups: Fact or a useful statistical fiction? Criminology, 43(4), 873-903.
  4. Olsen, M. K, & Schafer, J. L. (2001). A two-part random effects model for semicontinuous longitudinal data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 730-745.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muthén, B.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Muthén, Bengt
Venue
Infant and Child Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
623-625
ISSN
  • 1522-7219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-7227
OpenAlex
W2038460442
Cited by
120
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Infant and Child Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Keywords
growth mixture modeling, developmental trajectories, longitudinal analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review