Beyond the throwaway society: a life cycle-based assessment of the environmental benefit of reuse
Abstract
In the context of a circular economy, sustainable consumption is often seen as the antithesis of current consumption patterns, which have led to the definition of the so-called throwaway society. Reuse may provide a preferred alternative to other waste management options, because it promotes resource efficiency and may significantly reduce environmental impacts. To appraise the environmental benefits related to reuse of goods, a methodology adopting life cycle assessment (LCA) has been developed. A standardized procedure has been developed, identifying reference products within product category subject to reuse, and collecting reliable inventory data as a basis for calculating environmental impact through LCA. A case study on a second-hand shop is presented, and the avoided impacts are quantified. Inventory data were taken both from the literature and directly from sales and surveys submitted to customers. The results are presented, highlighting: 1) for each product category, the average avoided impacts for 1 unit of reused product considered; and 2) for the overall activities of the second-hand shop, the cumulative avoided impacts in 1 yr. In the case study, the higher contribution to avoided impacts comes from the apparel sector, due to the high amount of items sold, followed by the furniture sector, because of the high amount of environmental impacts avoided by the reuse of each single item.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For reuse, a 1:1 replacement rate presumes that the new owner of the reused item uses the item as many times as the owner would have used a brand new item, which has been shown to be unrealistic.
“For reuse, a 1:1 replacement rate presumes that the new owner of the reused item uses the item as many times as the owner would have used a brand new item, which has been shown to be unrealistic”
From Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review (2018) · cites this paper as Castellani et al., 2015
Cites
Evans, D. (2012) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038511416150 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536 · see citing works
Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review
Sandin, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266 · Cited by 1,087 · see citing works
“Studies to identify actual replacement rates have been conducted (Castellani et al., 2015; Stevenson and Gmitrowicz, 2012; Farrant et al., 2010; Thomas, 2003), and different replacement rates (i.e. not 1:1) have been considered for in some of the reviewed publications (Dahlbo et al., 2017; Fortuna…”
BackgroundMethodCircular supply chain management: a definition and structured literature review
Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303 · Cited by 894 · see citing works
Kaddoura, M., Kambanou, M. L., Tillman, A.-M., & Sakao, T. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11184819 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
The power of good decisions: promoting eco-informed design attitudes in plastic selection and use
Jones, M. P., Archodoulaki, V.-M., & Köck, B.-M. (2022) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106324 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Castellani, V., Sala, S., & Mirabella, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
- European Commission (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Castellani, Valentina
- Venue
- Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-12-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 373-382
- ISSN
- 1551-3777 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-3793
- OpenAlex
- W1588383648
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 3.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Mani Tese onlus (DCI NSA-ED/2011/239-451)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Keywords
- second-hand shops, throwaway society, circular economy, sustainable consumption, inventory data collection, reference products, furniture reuse, waste prevention, resource efficiency
- MeSH terms
- Conservation of Natural Resources, Environmental Pollution, Waste Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review