Cited by 167Environmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainable Supply Chain ManagementMunicipal Solid Waste Management

Beyond the throwaway society: a life cycle-based assessment of the environmental benefit of reuse

Castellani, Valentina, Sala, Serenella, Mirabella, Nadia·2014·Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Abstract

In the context of a circular economy, sustainable consumption is often seen as the antithesis of current consumption patterns, which have led to the definition of the so-called throwaway society. Reuse may provide a preferred alternative to other waste management options, because it promotes resource efficiency and may significantly reduce environmental impacts. To appraise the environmental benefits related to reuse of goods, a methodology adopting life cycle assessment (LCA) has been developed. A standardized procedure has been developed, identifying reference products within product category subject to reuse, and collecting reliable inventory data as a basis for calculating environmental impact through LCA. A case study on a second-hand shop is presented, and the avoided impacts are quantified. Inventory data were taken both from the literature and directly from sales and surveys submitted to customers. The results are presented, highlighting: 1) for each product category, the average avoided impacts for 1 unit of reused product considered; and 2) for the overall activities of the second-hand shop, the cumulative avoided impacts in 1 yr. In the case study, the higher contribution to avoided impacts comes from the apparel sector, due to the high amount of items sold, followed by the furniture sector, because of the high amount of environmental impacts avoided by the reuse of each single item.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ieam.1614

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For reuse, a 1:1 replacement rate presumes that the new owner of the reused item uses the item as many times as the owner would have used a brand new item, which has been shown to be unrealistic.

    “For reuse, a 1:1 replacement rate presumes that the new owner of the reused item uses the item as many times as the owner would have used a brand new item, which has been shown to be unrealistic”

    From Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review (2018) · cites this paper as Castellani et al., 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castellani, V., Sala, S., & Mirabella, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
  • European Commission (BE)
Corresponding author
Castellani, Valentina
Venue
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Published
2014-12-01
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
373-382
ISSN
  • 1551-3777 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-3793
OpenAlex
W1588383648
Cited by
167
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Mani Tese onlus (DCI NSA-ED/2011/239-451)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
second-hand shops, throwaway society, circular economy, sustainable consumption, inventory data collection, reference products, furniture reuse, waste prevention, resource efficiency
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Environmental Pollution, Waste Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review