Cited by 569Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityFood, Nutrition, and Cultural PracticesWaste Management and Recycling

Beyond the throwaway society: Ordinary domestic practice and a sociological approach to household food waste

Evans, David·2012·Sociology

Abstract

This article offers a sociological analysis of household food waste and its starting point is a critique of perspectives in which volumes of waste generation are used to infer the presence of a throwaway society. Drawing on broadly ethnographic examples, the analysis illustrates some of the ways in which the passage of ‘food’ into ‘waste’ arises as a consequence of the ways in which domestic practices are socially and materially organized. Specifically, attention is paid to: 1) routines of household food provisioning and the contingencies of everyday life; 2) the social relations manifest in the enduring convention of the family meal and; 3) the socio-temporal context of food practices. Taken together it is suggested that contemporary sociological approaches to home consumption, material culture and everyday life can usefully engage with public and policy concerns about the origins and consequences of food waste.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0038038511416150

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, D.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Evans, David
Venue
Sociology
Published
2011-10-27
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
41-56
ISSN
  • 0038-0385 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8684
OpenAlex
W2029183606
Cited by
569
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
22.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sociology (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
Keywords
household food waste, throwaway society, household practices, food provisioning, family meals, everyday life, household consumption, material culture, waste generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review