Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 606

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inhaled particles and lung cancer. Part A: Mechanisms

Open access
Knaapen, Ad M., Borm, Paul J.A., Albrecht, Catrin, Schins, Roel P.F.·2004·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Both occupational and environmental exposure to particles is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. Particles are thought to impact on genotoxicity as well as on cell proliferation via their ability to generate oxidants such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS). For mechanistic purposes, one should discriminate between a) the oxidant‐generating properties of particles themselves (i.e., acellular), which are mostly determined by the physicochemical characteristics of the particle surface, and b) the ability of particles to stimulate cellular oxidant generation. Cellular ROS/RNS can be generated by various mechanisms, including particle‐related mitochondrial activation or NAD(P)H‐oxidase enzymes. In addition, since particles can induce an inflammatory response, a further subdivision needs to be made between primary (i.e., particle‐driven) and secondary (i.e., inflammation‐driven) formation of oxidants. Particles may also affect genotoxicity by their ability to carry surface‐adsorbed carcinogenic components into the lung. Each of these pathways can impact on genotoxicity and proliferation, as well as on feedback mechanisms involving DNA repair or apoptosis. Although abundant evidence suggests that ROS/RNS mediate particle‐induced genotoxicity and mutagenesis, little information is available towards the subsequent steps leading to neoplastic changes. Additionally, since most of the proposed molecular mechanisms underlying particle‐related carcinogenesis have been derived from in vitro studies, there is a need for future studies that evaluate the implication of these mechanisms for in vivo lung cancer development. In this respect, transgenic and gene knockout animal models may provide a useful tool. Such studies should also include further assessment of the relative contributions of primary (inflammation‐independent) and secondary (inflammation‐driven) pathways. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.11708

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 606

Metadata

Authors
Knaapen, A. M., Borm, P. J. A., Albrecht, C., & Schins, R. P. F.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02-05
Volume
109
Issue
6
Pages
799-809
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W1965243648
Cited by
606
References
5
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhaled particles and lung cancer. Part A: Mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.11708
The paper
Knaapen, A. M., Borm, P. J. A., Albrecht, C., & Schins, R. P. F. (2004). Inhaled particles and lung cancer. Part A: Mechanisms. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.11708

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.