The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Body size and breast cancer risk: Findings from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC)
Open accessAbstract
The evidence for anthropometric factors influencing breast cancer risk is accumulating, but uncertainties remain concerning the role of fat distribution and potential effect modifiers. We used data from 73,542 premenopausal and 103,344 postmenopausal women from 9 European countries, taking part in the EPIC study. RRs from Cox regression models were calculated, using measured height, weight, BMI and waist and hip circumferences; categorized by cohort‐wide quintiles; and expressed as continuous variables, adjusted for study center, age and other risk factors. During 4.7 years of follow‐up, 1,879 incident invasive breast cancers were identified. In postmenopausal women, current HRT modified the body size–breast cancer association. Among nonusers, weight, BMI and hip circumference were positively associated with breast cancer risk (all ptrend ≤ 0.002); obese women (BMI > 30) had a 31% excess risk compared to women with BMI < 25. Among HRT users, body measures were inversely but nonsignificantly associated with breast cancer. Excess breast cancer risk with HRT was particularly evident among lean women. Pooled RRs per height increment of 5 cm were 1.05 (95% CI 1.00–1.16) in premenopausal and 1.10 (95% CI 1.05–1.16) in postmenopausal women. Among premenopausal women, hip circumference was the only other measure significantly related to breast cancer (ptrend = 0.03), after accounting for BMI. In postmenopausal women not taking exogenous hormones, general obesity is a significant predictor of breast cancer, while abdominal fat assessed as waist–hip ratio or waist circumference was not related to excess risk when adjusted for BMI. Among premenopausal women, weight and BMI showed nonsignificant inverse associations with breast cancer. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators (2002) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.288.3.321 · Cited by 15,889
Riboli, E., Hunt, K., Slimani, N., Ferrari, P., Norat, T., Fahey, M., Charrondière, U., Hémon, B., Casagrande, C., Vignat, J., et al. (2002) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2002394 · Cited by 1,866
Self-citationBody mass index, serum sex hormones, and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women
Endogenous Hormones Breast Cancer Collaborative Group (2003) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djg022 · Cited by 1,093
Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC–Oxford participants
Spencer, E. A., Appleby, P. N., Davey, G. K., & Key, T. J. (2002) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2001322 · Cited by 1,082
Self-citation
Cited by
Renehan, A. G., Tyson, M., Egger, M., Heller, R. F., & Zwahlen, M. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60269-x · Cited by 5,219
Epidemiological characteristics of and risk factors for breast cancer in the world
Momenimovahed, Z., & Salehiniya, H. (2019) · Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/bctt.s176070 · Cited by 1,050
Picon‐Ruiz, M., Morata‐Tarifa, C., Valle‐Goffin, J. J., Friedman, E. R., & Slingerland, J. M. (2017) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21405 · Cited by 893
Epidemiology of basal-like breast cancer
Millikan, R. C., Newman, B., Tse, C.-K., Moorman, P. G., Conway, K., Smith, L. V., Labbok, M. H., Geradts, J., Bensen, J. T., Jackson, S., et al. (2008) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-007-9632-6 · Cited by 886
PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway in Breast Cancer: From Molecular Landscape to Clinical Aspects
Miricescu, D., Totan, A., Stanescu-Spinu, I.-I., Badoiu, S. C., Stefani, C., & Greabu, M. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22010173 · Cited by 845
Metadata
- Authors
- Lahmann, P. H., Hoffmann, K., Allen, N., van Gils, C. H., Khaw, K., Tehard, B., Berrino, F., Tjønneland, A., Bigaard, J., Olsen, A., Overvad, K., Clavel‐Chapelon, F., Nagel, G., Boeing, H., Trichopoulos, D., Economou, G., Bellos, G., Palli, D., Tumino, R., Panico, S., Sacerdote, C., Krogh, V., Peeters, P. H. M., Bueno‐de‐Mesquita, H. B., Lund, E., Ardanaz, E., Amiano, P., Pera, G., Quirós, J. R., Martínez, C., Tormo, M. J., Wirfält, E., Berglund, G., Hallmans, G., Key, T. J., Reeves, G., Bingham, S., Norat, T., Biessy, C., Kaaks, R., & Riboli, E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-05-17
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 762-771
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W1998926248
- Cited by
- 580
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Body size and breast cancer risk: Findings from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.20315
- The paper
- Lahmann, P. H., Hoffmann, K., Allen, N., van Gils, C. H., Khaw, K., Tehard, B., Berrino, F., Tjønneland, A., Bigaard, J., Olsen, A., Overvad, K., Clavel‐Chapelon, F., Nagel, G., Boeing, H., Trichopoulos, D., Economou, G., Bellos, G., Palli, D., Tumino, R., . . . Riboli, E. (2004). Body size and breast cancer risk: Findings from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC). International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20315
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.