The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of epithelial ovarian cancer using 1H‐NMR‐based metabonomics
Abstract
Currently available serum biomarkers are insufficiently reliable to distinguish patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) from healthy individuals. Metabonomics, the study of metabolic processes in biologic systems, is based on the use of 1 H‐NMR spectroscopy and multivariate statistics for biochemical data generation and interpretation and may provide a characteristic fingerprint in disease. In an effort to examine the utility of the metabonomic approach for discriminating sera from women with EOC from healthy controls, we performed 1 H‐NMR spectroscopic analysis on preoperative serum specimens obtained from 38 patients with EOC, 12 patients with benign ovarian cysts and 53 healthy women. After data reduction, we applied both unsupervised Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and supervised Soft Independent Modeling of Class Analogy (SIMCA) for pattern recognition. The sensitivity and specificity tradeoffs were summarized for each variable using the area under the receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) curve. In addition, we analyzed the regions of NMR spectra that most strongly influence separation of sera of EOC patients from healthy controls. PCA analysis allowed correct separation of all serum specimens from 38 patients with EOC (100%) from all of the 21 premenopausal normal samples (100%) and from all the sera from patients with benign ovarian disease (100%). In addition, it was possible to correctly separate 37 of 38 (97.4%) cancer specimens from 31 of 32 (97%) postmenopausal control sera. SIMCA analysis using the Cooman's plot demonstrated that sera classes from patients with EOC, benign ovarian cysts and the postmenopausal healthy controls did not share multivariate space, providing validation for the class separation. ROC analysis indicated that the sera from patients with and without disease could be identified with 100% sensitivity and specificity at the 1 H‐NMR regions 2.77 parts per million (ppm) and 2.04 ppm from the origin (AUC of ROC curve = 1.0). In addition, the regression coefficients most influential for the EOC samples compared to postmenopausal controls lie around δ3.7 ppm (due mainly to sugar hydrogens). Other loadings most influential for the EOC samples lie around δ2.25 ppm and δ1.18 ppm. These findings indicate that 1 H‐NMR metabonomic analysis of serum achieves complete separation of EOC patients from healthy controls. The metabonomic approach deserves further evaluation as a potential novel strategy for the early detection of epithelial ovarian cancer. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer
Petricoin, E. F., Ardekani, A. M., Hitt, B. A., Levine, P. J., Fusaro, V. A., Steinberg, S. M., Mills, G. B., Simone, C., Fishman, D. A., Kohn, E. C., et al. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07746-2 · Cited by 3,236
Phases of Biomarker Development for Early Detection of Cancer
Pepe, M. S., Etzioni, R., Feng, Z., Potter, J. D., Thompson, M. L., Thornquist, M., Winget, M., & Yasui, Y. (2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.14.1054 · Cited by 1,686
Cited by
Metabolomics in human nutrition: opportunities and challenges
Gibney, M. J., Walsh, M. C., Brennan, L., Roche, H. M., German, B. J., & van Ommen, B. (2005) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn.82.3.497 · Cited by 452
Metabolomic Mapping of Atypical Antipsychotic Effects in Schizophrenia
Kaddurah-Daouk, R., McEvoy, J., Baillie, R. A., Lee, D., Yao, J. K., Doraiswamy, P. M., & Krishnan, K. R. R. (2007) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4002000 · Cited by 262
Analytical and statistical approaches to metabolomics research
Issaq, H. J., Van, Q. N., Waybright, T. J., Muschik, G. M., & Veenstra, T. D. (2009) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.200900152 · Cited by 227
The complex links between dietary phytochemicals and human health deciphered by metabolomics
Manach, C., Hubert, J., Llorach, R., & Scalbert, A. (2009) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.200800516 · Cited by 218
Lin, Y., Ma, C., Liu, C., Wang, Z., Yang, J., Liu, X., Shen, Z., & Wu, R. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.8762 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Odunsi, K., Wollman, R. M., Ambrosone, C. B., Hutson, A., McCann, S. E., Tammela, J., Geisler, J. P., Miller, G., Sellers, T., Cliby, W., Qian, F., Keitz, B., Intengan, M., Lele, S., & Alderfer, J. L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-12-08
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 782-788
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W1978417221
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of epithelial ovarian cancer using 1H‐NMR‐based metabonomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.20651
- The paper
- Odunsi, K., Wollman, R. M., Ambrosone, C. B., Hutson, A., McCann, S. E., Tammela, J., Geisler, J. P., Miller, G., Sellers, T., Cliby, W., Qian, F., Keitz, B., Intengan, M., Lele, S., & Alderfer, J. L. (2005). Detection of epithelial ovarian cancer using 1H‐NMR‐based metabonomics. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.