The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Trends in incidence and prognosis for head and neck cancer in the United States: A site‐specific analysis of the SEER database
Open accessAbstract
Despite recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer, there has been little evidence of improvement in 5‐year survival rates over the last few decades. To determine more accurate trends in site‐specific outcomes as opposed to a more general overview of head and neck cancer patients, we analyzed the site‐specific data collected in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results—SEER Public‐Use Database 1973–1999. Based on the selection criteria, 96,232 cases were evaluated for trend analysis in incidence, clinical stage, treatment and 5‐year survival. During the period 1973–1999, site‐specific incidence rates for head and neck cancer changed significantly. Site‐specific analysis of survival from 1974–1997 showed significant improvements in 5‐year survival rates for cancers of the nasopharynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx (38.1% to 56.7% for nasopharynx, p < 0.001; 36.3% to 49.1% for oropharynx, p = 0.001 and 28.3% to 33.3% for hypopharynx, p = 0.015). The prognosis for early‐stage salivary gland cancer during 1983–1997 and late‐stage larynx cancer during 1974–1997 also demonstrated improvement (82.7% to 88.5%, p = 0.012 and 22.2% to 38.3%, p = 0.013, respectively). On the other hand, the prognosis for regional stage oral cavity cancer as well as early‐stage larynx cancer patients declined during 1983–1997 (49.2% to 43.8%, p = 0.032 and 82.3% to 74.3%, p = 0.002, respectively). Site‐specific changes in treatment and staging were also noted. Site‐specific analysis allows for a more accurate description of incidence, staging, treatment, and prognostic trends for head and neck cancer. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Immune Landscape of Viral- and Carcinogen-Driven Head and Neck Cancer
Cillo, A. R., Kürten, C. H. L., Tabib, T., Qi, Z., Onkar, S., Wang, T., Liu, A., Duvvuri, U., Kim, S., Soose, R. J., et al. (2020) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.11.014 · Cited by 668
Molecular biology of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
Perez-Ordoñez, B., Beauchemin, M., & Jordan, R. C. K. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jcp.2003.007641 · Cited by 314
Epidemiological Trends of Head and Neck Cancer in the United States: A SEER Population Study
Mourad, M., Jetmore, T., Jategaonkar, A. A., Moubayed, S., Moshier, E., & Urken, M. L. (2017) · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2017.05.008 · Cited by 308
Zhao, M., Sano, D., Pickering, C. R., Jasser, S. A., Henderson, Y. C., Clayman, G. L., Sturgis, E. M., Ow, T. J., Lotan, R., Carey, T. E., et al. (2011) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-0690 · Cited by 250
Howren, M. B., Christensen, A. J., Karnell, L. H., & Funk, G. F. (2013) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029940 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Carvalho, A. L., Nishimoto, I. N., Califano, J. A., & Kowalski, L. P.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02-18
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 806-816
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W2031579870
- Cited by
- 867
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in incidence and prognosis for head and neck cancer in the United States: A site‐specific analysis of the SEER database. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.20740
- The paper
- Carvalho, A. L., Nishimoto, I. N., Califano, J. A., & Kowalski, L. P. (2005). Trends in incidence and prognosis for head and neck cancer in the United States: A site‐specific analysis of the SEER database. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20740
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.