The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high‐grade cervical lesions: A meta‐analysis update
Open accessAbstract
Data on human papillomavirus (HPV) type distribution in invasive and pre‐invasive cervical cancer is essential to predict the future impact of HPV16/18 vaccines and HPV‐based screening tests. A meta‐analyses of HPV type distribution in invasive cervical cancer (ICC) and high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) identified a total of 14,595 and 7,094 cases, respectively. In ICC, HPV16 was the most common, and HPV18 the second most common, type in all continents. Combined HPV16/18 prevalence among ICC cases was slightly higher in Europe, North America and Australia (74–77%) than in Africa, Asia and South/Central America (65–70%). The next most common HPV types were the same in each continent, namely HPV31, 33, 35, 45, 52 and 58, although their relative importance differed somewhat by region. HPV18 was significantly more prevalent in adeno/adenosquamous carcinoma than in squamous cell carcinoma, with the reverse being true for HPV16, 31, 33, 52 and 58. Among HSIL cases, HPV16/18 prevalence was 52%. However, HPV 16, 18 and 45 were significantly under‐represented, and other high‐risk HPV types significantly over‐represented in HSIL compared to ICC, suggesting differences in type‐specific risks for progression. Data on HPV‐typed ICC and HSIL cases were particularly scarce from large regions of Africa and Central Asia. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
de Sanjose, S., Quint, W. G., Alemany, L., Geraets, D. T., Klaustermeier, J. E., Lloveras, B., Tous, S., Felix, A., Bravo, L. E., Shin, H.-R., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70230-8 · Cited by 2,728
Paavonen, J., Jenkins, D., Bosch, F. X., Naud, P., Salmerón, J., Wheeler, C. M., Chow, S.-N., Apter, D. L., Kitchener, H. C., Castellsague, X., et al. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60946-5 · Cited by 1,315
Guan, P., Howell‐Jones, R., Li, N., Bruni, L., de Sanjosé, S., Franceschi, S., & Clifford, G. M. (2012) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.27485 · Cited by 927
Self-citationArbyn, M., Anttila, A., Jordan, J., Ronco, G., Schenck, U., Segnan, N., Wiener, H., Herbert, A., & von Karsa, L. (2010) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp471 · Cited by 760
Meijer, C. J. L. M., Berkhof, J., Castle, P. E., Hesselink, A. T., Franco, E. L., Ronco, G., Arbyn, M., Bosch, F. X., Cuzick, J., Dillner, J., et al. (2009) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.24010 · Cited by 692
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, J. S., Lindsay, L., Hoots, B., Keys, J., Franceschi, S., Winer, R., & Clifford, G. M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-05-25
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 621-632
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W2047580791
- Cited by
- 1,686
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 85.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high‐grade cervical lesions: A meta‐analysis update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.22527
- The paper
- Smith, J. S., Lindsay, L., Hoots, B., Keys, J., Franceschi, S., Winer, R., & Clifford, G. M. (2007). Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high‐grade cervical lesions: A meta‐analysis update. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.22527
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.