The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lung cancer mortality trends in 36 European countries: secular trends and birth cohort patterns by sex and region 1970–2007
Abstract
Smoking is a major contributor to all‐cause mortality in Europe and accounts for one‐fifth of the cancer‐related deaths. Monitoring the tobacco epidemic via an analysis of lung cancer trends is essential in helping countries arrest the effects of tobacco epidemic in the region. The study aims to provide a comprehensive and up‐to‐date overview of the temporal patterns of lung cancer mortality in Europe, emphasizing country‐ and sex‐specific differences. National lung cancer mortality data were extracted from the WHO mortality databank by age, sex, year of death (1970–2007) for 36 countries in Europe. Trends in lung cancer mortality in men have tended to decrease in many European countries during the last two decades, particularly in North and Western Europe. Among women, mortality rates are still increasing in many countries, although in a few populations, rates are beginning to stabilize, notably in the high‐risk countries within Eastern Europe (Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic), and in Northern Europe (Denmark, Iceland and the United Kingdom). Men and women are clearly in very different phases of the smoking epidemic, and, as reflected in the mortality rates by birth cohort, the stage varies widely by country within each European region. That lung cancer mortality trends in men are on a downwards path in most European countries while female rates continue to rise, points to an urgent need for national and European prevention strategies that target tobacco cessation and prevention among European women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The problem of tobacco smoking
Edwards, R. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7433.217 · Cited by 288
Cited by
Jemal, A., Bray, F., Center, M. M., Ferlay, J., Ward, E., & Forman, D. (2011) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20107 · Cited by 54,679
Self-citationGlobal cancer statistics, 2012
Torre, L. A., Bray, F., Siegel, R. L., Ferlay, J., Lortet‐Tieulent, J., & Jemal, A. (2015) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21262 · Cited by 26,850
Self-citationGlobal patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends
Jemal, A., Center, M. M., DeSantis, C., & Ward, E. M. (2010) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-0437 · Cited by 2,778
Novello, S., Barlesi, F., Califano, R., Cufer, T., Ekman, S., Levra, M. G., Kerr, K., Popat, S., Reck, M., Senan, S., et al. (2016) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw326 · Cited by 2,631
Dyba, T., Randi, G., Bray, F., Martos, C., Giusti, F., Nicholson, N., Gavin, A., Flego, M., Neamtiu, L., Dimitrova, N., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.039 · Cited by 641
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bray, F. I., & Weiderpass, E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-12
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1454-1466
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W2070691701
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.