Cited by 175Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesGenetic factors in colorectal cancerLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

KRAS gene amplification in colorectal cancer and impact on response to EGFR‐targeted therapy

Open access
Valtorta, Emanuele, Misale, Sandra, Sartore‐Bianchi, Andrea, Nagtegaal, Iris D., Paraf, François, Lauricella, Calogero, Dimartino, Valentina, Hobor, Sebastijan +13 more·2013·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

KRAS mutations are the most common oncogenic event in colorectal cancer (CRC) progression and their occurrence is associated with lack of response to anti epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeted therapies. Using preclinical models and patients' samples we recently reported that the emergence of KRAS mutations but also KRAS amplification is associated with acquired resistance to the EGFR inhibitors cetuximab or panitumumab. We reasoned that KRAS amplification may also be responsible for primary resistance to these agents. Furthermore, while the prevalence of KRAS mutations has been well established in CRC, little is known about the frequency of KRAS amplification in large CRC series. We performed a screening of 1,039 CRC samples to assess the prevalence of KRAS amplification in this tumor type and further evaluated the role of this genetic alteration on the sensitivity to anti EGFR therapies. We detected KRAS amplification in 7/1,039 (0.67%) and 1/102 evaluable CRC specimens and cell lines, respectively. KRAS amplification was mutually exclusive with KRAS mutations. Tumors or cell lines harboring this genetic lesion are not responsive to anti‐EGFR inhibitors. Although KRAS amplification is an infrequent event in CRC, it might be responsible for precluding response to anti‐EGFR treatment in a small proportion of patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.28106

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. V C 2013 UICC 10970215, 2013, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.28106 by Mount Vernon Nazarene University, Wiley Online Library on [04/10/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License globally coordinated but not locally targeted. PLoS One 2010;5:e9651. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valtorta, E., Misale, S., Sartore‐Bianchi, A., Nagtegaal, I. D., Paraf, F., Lauricella, C., Dimartino, V., Hobor, S., Jacobs, B., Ercolani, C., Lamba, S., Scala, E., Veronese, S., Laurent‐Puig, P., Siena, S., Tejpar, S., Mottolese, M., Punt, C. J. A., Gambacorta, M., Bardelli, A., & Di Nicolantonio, F.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
  • Candiolo Cancer Institute (IT)
  • The Falck Division of Medical Oncology Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3 Milano Italy
  • Department of Pathology Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Nijmegen The Netherlands
  • Hôpital Universitaire Dupuytren (FR)
  • Instituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena (IT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • IFOM (IT)
  • Department of Oncology University of Torino Candiolo (Torino) Italy
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-16
Volume
133
Issue
5
Pages
1259-1265
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W2150840254
Cited by
175
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 6
FWCI
12.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • European Commission (259015)
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (12812, 5 x mille)
  • Regione Piemonte
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
KRAS amplification, colorectal cancer, anti-EGFR therapy, cetuximab, panitumumab, KRAS mutation, primary resistance
MeSH terms
Gene Amplification, Humans, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Colorectal Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), ras Proteins, Cell Line, Tumor, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review