Cited by 1,889Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer

Open access
Misale, Sandra, Yaeger, Rona, Hobor, Sebastijan, Scala, Elisa, Janakiraman, Manickam, Liska, David, Valtorta, Emanuele, Schiavo, Roberta +18 more·2012·Nature

Abstract

A main limitation of therapies that selectively target kinase signalling pathways is the emergence of secondary drug resistance. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that binds the extracellular domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is effective in a subset of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancers. After an initial response, secondary resistance invariably ensues, thereby limiting the clinical benefit of this drug. The molecular bases of secondary resistance to cetuximab in colorectal cancer are poorly understood. Here we show that molecular alterations (in most instances point mutations) of KRAS are causally associated with the onset of acquired resistance to anti-EGFR treatment in colorectal cancers. Expression of mutant KRAS under the control of its endogenous gene promoter was sufficient to confer cetuximab resistance, but resistant cells remained sensitive to combinatorial inhibition of EGFR and mitogen-activated protein-kinase kinase (MEK). Analysis of metastases from patients who developed resistance to cetuximab or panitumumab showed the emergence of KRAS amplification in one sample and acquisition of secondary KRAS mutations in 60% (6 out of 10) of the cases. KRAS mutant alleles were detectable in the blood of cetuximab-treated patients as early as 10 months before radiographic documentation of disease progression. In summary, the results identify KRAS mutations as frequent drivers of acquired resistance to cetuximab in colorectal cancers, indicate that the emergence of KRAS mutant clones can be detected non-invasively months before radiographic progression and suggest early initiation of a MEK inhibitor as a rational strategy for delaying or reversing drug resistance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11156

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients who initially respond to anti-EGFR develop acquired resistance within 12 to 18 months due to secondary mutations in KRAS genes, EGFR exodomain alteration, and clonal selection.

    “Patients who initially respond to anti-EGFR develop acquired resistance within 12 to 18 months due to secondary mutations in KRAS genes, EGFR exodomain alteration, and clonal selection [9].”

    From Overcoming Resistance to Anti-EGFR Therapies: Mechanisms of Cetuximab and Panitumumab Resistance and Emerging Combination Strategies (2026) · cites this paper as [9]

    The paper reports that secondary resistance typically occurs within 9–18 months, not specifically 12–18 months, and identifies KRAS mutations and selection of pre-existing KRAS-mutant clones as resistance mechanisms (Abstract; page unavailable). It does not establish EGFR extracellular-domain alteration as a mechanism in its own study; that finding appears only in a cited reference. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • KRAS acquired mutations are responsible for secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in CRC.

    “We and others previously reported that KRAS acquired mutations are responsible for secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in CRC(22, 23).”
  • Patients who fail to respond to therapy initially exhibit intrinsic resistance, whereas those who relapse after initial response are associated with acquired resistance.

    “Patients who fail to respond to therapy initially exhibit intrinsic resistance, whereas those who relapse after initial response are associated with acquired resistance [9].”
  • KRAS amplification and secondary KRAS mutations (G12C, G12D, G13D, Q61H) were detected as a mechanism of acquired resistance in metastatic colorectal cancer patients relapsing on cetuximab or panitumumab.

    “Emergence of KRAS amplification and acquisition of secondary KRAS mutations (G12C, G12D, G13D and Q61H) was detected as one mechanism of acquired resistance in metastatic CRC patients, who relapsed on cetuximab or panitumumab treatment (78, 79).”
  • KRAS point mutations and gene copy number gains are responsible for acquired resistance in 38-60% of patients who relapse on cetuximab or panitumumab.

    “KRAS point mutations and gene copy number gains are responsible not only for primary but also for acquired resistance in 38–60 % of patients who relapse on cetuximab or panitumumab [37-39].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]Di Nicolantonio F Replacement of normal with mutant alleles in the genome of normal human cells unveils mutation-specific drug responses Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105 20864 20869 10.1073/pnas.0808757105 2008 19106301 PMC2634925 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Misale, S., Yaeger, R., Hobor, S., Scala, E., Janakiraman, M., Liska, D., Valtorta, E., Schiavo, R., Buscarino, M., Siravegna, G., Bencardino, K., Cercek, A., Chen, C.-T., Veronese, S., Zanon, C., Sartore-Bianchi, A., Gambacorta, M., Gallicchio, M., Vakiani, E., Boscaro, V., Medico, E., Weiser, M., Siena, S., Di Nicolantonio, F., Solit, D., & Bardelli, A.
Affiliations
  • Candiolo Cancer Institute (IT)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • IFOM (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Solit, David
  • Bardelli, Alberto
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-06
Volume
486
Issue
7404
Pages
532-536
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2062109911
Cited by
1,889
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 138 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 163 · 2018: 161 · 2017: 171 · 2016: 177 · 2015: 163 · 2014: 145 · 2013: 133 · 2012: 28
FWCI
73.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • European Commission (259015)
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (5 x mille)
  • Regione Piemonte
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA127240, P30CA008748, T32CA009207, R25CA020449)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
KRAS mutation, acquired drug resistance, anti-EGFR therapy, cetuximab resistance, colorectal cancer, EGFR, K-ras oncogene, circulating tumor DNA, tumor subclones, MEK inhibition, combination therapy, metastatic colorectal cancer, tumor heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Panitumumab, Alleles, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humans, Mutation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Genes, ras, Colorectal Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Disease Progression, ras Proteins, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, Cell Line, Tumor, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review