Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 601

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

P53 expression in breast cancer

Cattoretti, Giorgio, Rilke, Franco, Andreola, Salvatore, D'Amato, Lucia, Delia, Domenico·1988·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Immunohistochemical evaluation of 200 primary breast cancers with the anti‐p53 mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) PAb421 showed positivity in nuclei of malignant cells in 31 cases (15.5%). PAb421+ cases were significantly more frequently epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF‐R)‐positive (67.7%; p < 0.001) and estrogen receptor (ER)‐negative (73.3%; p < 0.001); they displayed surface histocompatibility class‐1 (80.6%; p < 0.01) and II (74.2%; p < 0.05) antigens. Low values for progesterone receptor (mean 67.20 ± 25.2 fmol/mg; p < 0.05) and a high number of cells positive for the proliferationassociated antigen Ki‐67 (log mean 6.88 ± 0.33; p < 0.01) were found in PAb421+ tumors as well as a high number of grade‐3 infiltrating duct carcinomas (70%; p = 0.01). Of the 200 cases of mammary carcinoma, 88 were further analyzed using another human specific anti‐p53 MAb PAb1801, and 40 (45.5%) were found positive. This MAb stained all the PAb421+ cases and was significantly associated with negative ER status (39.5%; p < 0.05) and high Ki‐67 scores (log mean 6.93 ± 0.24; p = 0.001). Analysis of PAb1801+/Pab421− cases for HLA antigens, EGF‐R and ER showed a phenotype similar to that of the p53−ve/ER+ carcinomas, except for the high Ki‐67 score. No differences in age of the patient, number of involved nodes, tumor size, ploidy or labelling index scores were evident between p53+ and − carcinomas. We concluded that p53 in mammary carcinomas is associated with ER‐negative, growth factor receptor‐positive, high‐grade tumors, and is a promising new parameter to evaluate the cellular biology and prognosis of breast cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.2910410204

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 601

Metadata

Authors
Cattoretti, G., Rilke, F., Andreola, S., D'Amato, L., & Delia, D.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-02-15
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
178-183
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W2105298270
Cited by
601
References
43
FWCI
9.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: P53 expression in breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.2910410204
The paper
Cattoretti, G., Rilke, F., Andreola, S., D'Amato, L., & Delia, D. (1988). P53 expression in breast cancer. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910410204

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.