The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk factors for oral cancer in Brazil: A case‐control study
Abstract
A case‐control study of risk factors for carcinomas of the tongue, gum, floor, and other specified parts of the mouth was conducted in 3 metropolitan areas in Brazil: São Paulo (South‐east), Curitiba (South), and Goiãnia (Central‐West). We analyzed information on demographics, occupational history, environmental exposures, tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking habits, as well as diet, oral and other health characteristics obtained from interviews with 232 cases and 464 hospital non‐cancer controls matched for 5‐year age‐group, sex, hospital catchment area and trimester of admission. Tobacco and alcohol consumption were the strongest risk factors irrespective of the anatomical site. The adjusted relative risks (RR) for ever vs. never smokers were: 6.3, 13.9, and 7.0, for industrial‐brand cigarettes, pipe, and hand‐rolled cigarettes, respectively. A strong correlation was seen between number of pack‐years and risk. The RR for the heaviest vs. the lowest consumption categories (>100 vs. <1 pack‐years) was 14.8. Risk levels generally decreased to those of never smokers after 10 years had elapsed since stopping smoking. The risk associated with alcohol was mostly evident for wine (cancer of the tongue) and “cachaça” (all sites), a hard liquor distilled from sugar cane. Other important risk factors were drinking “chimarrão” (a type of maté), use of a wood stove for cooking, and frequent consumption of charcoal‐grilled meat and manioc. Oral hygiene characteristics represented correlates of disease risk. A significant protective effect was observed for consumption of carotene‐rich vegetables and citric fruits, but not for green vegetables in general.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: A review of the epidemiological evidence
Block, G., Patterson, B., & Subar, A. (1992) · Nutrition and Cancer · doi:10.1080/01635589209514201 · Cited by 3,238
Vegetables, Fruit, and Cancer Prevention
STEINMETZ, K. A., & POTTER, J. D. (1996) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(96)00273-8 · Cited by 2,118
Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. I. Epidemiology
Steinmetz, K. A., & Potter, J. D. (1991) · Cancer Causes and Control · doi:10.1007/bf00051672 · Cited by 1,118
National burden of disease in India from indoor air pollution
Smith, K. R. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.24.13286 · Cited by 489
Conway, D. I., Petticrew, M., Marlborough, H., Berthiller, J., Hashibe, M., & Macpherson, L. M. D. (2008) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.23430 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Franco, E. L., Kowalski, L. P., Oliveira, B. V., Curado, M. P., Pereira, R. N., Silva, M. E., Fava, A. S., & Torloni, H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-06-15
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 992-1000
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W2010870295
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk factors for oral cancer in Brazil: A case‐control study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.2910430607
- The paper
- Franco, E. L., Kowalski, L. P., Oliveira, B. V., Curado, M. P., Pereira, R. N., Silva, M. E., Fava, A. S., & Torloni, H. (1989). Risk factors for oral cancer in Brazil: A case‐control study. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910430607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.