Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Calibration of misonidazole labeling by simultaneous measurement of oxygen tension and labeling density in multicellular spheroids

Gross, Markus W., Karbach, Ulrich, Groebe, Karlfried, Franko, Allan J., Mueller‐Klieser, Wolfgang·1995·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

To correlate misonidazole concentrations and oxygen pressures (Po 2) at identical locations within EMT6/Ro multi‐cell spheroids (mean diameters ± SD: 867 ± 20 μm), Po 2 measurements were performed with oxygen‐sensitive microelectrodes during incubation of these spheroids with tritiated misonidazole (10 mg/l; 445 μCi/mg). In each individual spheroid, Po 2 profiles were correlated with the corresponding spatial distribution of misonidazole as quantified by conventional autoradiography and grain counting. To compare the oxygenation status of spheroids in the measuring chamber with that of spheroids in spinner culture, misonidazole labeling was performed in both environments following the same protocol. All experiments were conducted in 20% oxygen and BME or in 5% oxygen and DMEM to obtain spheroids with different degrees of oxygenation. Labeled misonidazole was fairly evenly distributed in the outer, better oxygenated regions of EMT6 spheroids. In contrast, there was an accumulation of the labeled substance near central necrosis where low oxygen tensions were measured. Grain densities were similar at corresponding oxygen pressures under both environmental conditions. Except for some scatter, grain density as a function of oxygen pressure showed little variation in the Po 2 range of 20–60 mm Hg, but exhibited a steep increase below 10 mm Hg. The findings imply that a substantial rise in local misonidazole labeling indicates a meta‐bolically active tissue region at low Po 2 that is not necessarily identical with the radiobiologically hypoxic cell fraction. A comparison of the labeling densities of spheroids in spinner flasks and in the Po 2 measuring chamber indicates that oxygenation of spheroids is better in rotation culture than during microelectrode measurements. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.2910610422

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 206

Metadata

Authors
Gross, M. W., Karbach, U., Groebe, K., Franko, A. J., & Mueller‐Klieser, W.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-05-16
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
567-573
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W1978282308
Cited by
206
References
2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calibration of misonidazole labeling by simultaneous measurement of oxygen tension and labeling density in multicellular spheroids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.2910610422
The paper
Gross, M. W., Karbach, U., Groebe, K., Franko, A. J., & Mueller‐Klieser, W. (1995). Calibration of misonidazole labeling by simultaneous measurement of oxygen tension and labeling density in multicellular spheroids. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910610422

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.