Cited by 104Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchPancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

Phase I/II trial of pimasertib plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

Open access
Van Cutsem, Eric, Hidalgo, Manuel, Canon, Jean‐Luc, Macarulla, Teresa, Bazin, Igor, Poddubskaya, Elena, Manojlovic, Nebojsa, Radenkovic, Dejan +6 more·2018·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

The selective MEK1/2 inhibitor pimasertib has shown anti‐tumour activity in a pancreatic tumour model. This phase I/II, two‐part trial was conducted in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPaCa) (NCT01016483). In the phase I part, oral pimasertib was given once daily discontinuously (5 days on/2 days off treatment) or twice daily continuously (n = 53) combined with weekly gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m 2) in 28‐day cycles to identify the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of pimasertib. In the phase II part, patients were randomised to pimasertib (RP2D) or placebo plus weekly gemcitabine (n = 88) to investigate progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. The RP2D was determined to be 60 mg BID. PFS and OS outcomes did not indicate any treatment benefit for pimasertib over placebo in combination with gemcitabine (median PFS 3.7 and 2.8 months, respectively, HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.58–1.42: median OS 7.3 vs. 7.6 months, respectively). KRAS status did not influence PFS or OS. The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was 91.1% and 85.7% for pimasertib/gemcitabine and placebo/gemcitabine respectively, but there was a higher incidence of ocular events with pimasertib/gemcitabine (28.9% vs. 4.8% for placebo/gemcitabine). In conclusion, no clinical benefit was observed with first‐line pimasertib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with mPaCa.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.31603

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A phase I/II trial found that adding the MEK inhibitor pimasertib to gemcitabine did not improve survival over gemcitabine alone.

    “In a phase I/II trial, a combination of the MEK inhibitor pimasertib and gemcitabine did not give superior survival rate than gemcitabine alone (89).”

    From KRAS mutation in pancreatic cancer (2021) · cites this paper as [89]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIR- INOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancre- atic cancer. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1817-25.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Cutsem, E., Hidalgo, M., Canon, J., Macarulla, T., Bazin, I., Poddubskaya, E., Manojlovic, N., Radenkovic, D., Verslype, C., Raymond, E., Cubillo, A., Schueler, A., Zhao, C., & Hammel, P.
Affiliations
  • Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology University Hospitals Gasthuisberg/Leuven & KULeuven Leuven Belgium
  • Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (ES)
  • Grand Charleroi Hospital (BE)
  • Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
  • Sechenov University (RU)
  • Military Medical Academy (RS)
  • University of Belgrade (RS)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Medical Oncology Département Saint Joseph Hospital Paris France
  • Universidad San Pablo CEU (ES)
  • Merck KGaA, Darmstadt (Germany) (DE)
  • EMD Serono, Inc. (United States) (US)
  • Hôpital Beaujon (FR)
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-09
Volume
143
Issue
8
Pages
2053-2064
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W2803544044
Cited by
104
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and EMD Serono, Inc. (NCT01016483)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Keywords
pimasertib, MEK inhibitors, gemcitabine, metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, first-line therapy, recommended phase 2 dose, progression-free survival, overall survival, KRAS status, ocular adverse effects, drug safety
MeSH terms
Progression-Free Survival, Gemcitabine, Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Deoxycytidine, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Niacinamide, Pancreatic Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review