Cited by 38COVID-19 and healthcare impactsGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

The impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on cancer diagnosis based on pathology notifications: A comparison across the Nordic countries during 2020

Open access
Johansson, Anna L. V., Larønningen, Siri, Skovlund, Charlotte Wessel, Kristiansen, Marnar Fríðheim, Mørch, Lina Steinrud, Friis, Søren, Johannesen, Tom Børge, Myklebust, Tor Åge +10 more·2022·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

The severity of the COVID‐19 pandemic and subsequent mitigation strategies have varied across the Nordic countries. In a joint Nordic population‐based effort, we compared patterns of new cancer cases and notifications between the Nordic countries during 2020. We used pathology notifications to cancer registries in Denmark, the Faroe Islands, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden to determine monthly numbers of pathology notifications of malignant and in situ tumours from January to December 2020 compared to 2019 (2017‐2019 for Iceland and the Faroe Islands). We compared new cancer cases per month based on unique individuals with pathology notifications. In April and May 2020, the numbers of new malignant cases declined in all Nordic countries, except the Faroe Islands, compared to previous year(s). The largest reduction was observed in Sweden (May: −31.2%, 95% CI −33.9, −28.3), followed by significant declines in Finland, Denmark and Norway, and a nonsignificant decline in Iceland. In Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland the reporting rates during the second half of 2020 rose to almost the same level as in 2019. However, in Sweden and Finland, the increase did not compensate for the spring decline (annual reduction −6.2% and −3.6%, respectively). Overall, similar patterns were observed for in situ tumours. The COVID‐19 pandemic led to a decline in rates of new cancer cases in Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Norway, with the most pronounced reduction in Sweden. Possible explanations include the severity of the pandemic, temporary halting of screening activities and changes in healthcare seeking behaviour.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.34029

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several registries have reported that having received relatively fewer pathology reports during earlier months was offset by increased diagnostic activity in later months.

    “several registries have reported that, having received relatively fewer pathology reports during earlier months was offset by increased diagnostic activity in later months.[184][185][186]”

    From Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. (2024) · cites this paper as [186]

    The Results report fewer pathology notifications in April and May 2020 and a later rebound. They say the rebound largely compensated for the earlier deficit in Iceland, but recovery was less pronounced in Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland. The claim overstates how broadly the earlier shortfall was offset. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [17]COVID‐aim1, Birgisson H, Hilmarsdottir H, Palsson RLT. COVID‐19 and cancer incidence in Iceland during year 2020. Letter to Laeknabladid [in Icelandic]. Laeknabladid. 2021; 107: 206‐ 207.
  2. [18]Pitkäniemi J, Virtanen A, Tanskanen T. Cancer Samples Declined in Spring 2020: Is the Coronavirus Pandemic Reflected in the Cancer Burden? [Syöpänäytteet vähenivät keväällä 2020: Heijastuuko koronaviruspandemia syöpätaakkaan?] Duodecim; 2021:137 [in Finnish].
  3. [21]Laronningen S, Skog A, Gulbrandsen J, et al. Considerable Decline in Cancer Diagnoses During the COVID‐19 Pandemic. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2021:141. 33685115

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johansson, A. L. V., Larønningen, S., Skovlund, C. W., Kristiansen, M. F., Mørch, L. S., Friis, S., Johannesen, T. B., Myklebust, T. Å., Skog, A., Pettersson, D., Birgisson, H., Virtanen, A., Malila, N., Pitkäniemi, J., Tanskanen, T., Tryggvadóttir, L., Ursin, G., & Lambe, M.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Cancer Registry of Norway (NO)
  • Danish Cancer Society (DK)
  • University of the Faroe Islands (FO)
  • Ålesund Hospital (NO)
  • National Board of Health and Welfare (SE)
  • Icelandic Cancer Society (IS)
  • Finnish Cancer Registry (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Cancer Registry of Iceland Icelandic Cancer Society Reykjavik Iceland
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Johansson, Anna L. V.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-04-25
Volume
151
Issue
3
Pages
381-395
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W4223929323
Cited by
38
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, cancer diagnosis, cancer registry, new cancer cases, cancer screening, health-seeking behavior, Nordic countries, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Norway, Iceland, Faroe Islands
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Denmark, Finland, Humans, Iceland, Neoplasms, Norway, Scandinavian and Nordic Countries, Sweden, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review