Cited by 646COVID-19 and healthcare impactsGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts

Impact of COVID-19 on cancer care: How the pandemic is delaying cancer diagnosis and treatment for American seniors

Open access
Patt, Debra, Gordan, Lucio, Diaz, Michael, Okon, Ted, Grady, Lance, Harmison, Merrill, Markward, Nathan, Sullivan, Milena +2 more·2020·JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics

Abstract

PURPOSE: While the immediate care and access disruptions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic have received growing attention in certain areas, the full range of gaps in cancer screenings and treatment is not yet well understood or well documented throughout the country comprehensively. METHODS: This study used a large medical claims clearinghouse database representing 5%-7% of the Medicare fee-for-service population to characterize changes in the utilization of cancer care services and gain insight into the impact of COVID-19 on the US cancer population, including identification of new patients, gaps in access to care, and disruption of treatment journeys. RESULTS: In March-July 2020, in comparison with the baseline period of March-July 2019, there is a substantial decrease in cancer screenings, visits, therapy, and surgeries, with variation by cancer type and site of service. At the peak of the pandemic in April, screenings for breast, colon, prostate, and lung cancers were lower by 85%, 75%, 74%, and 56%, respectively. Significant utilization reductions were observed in April for hospital outpatient evaluation and management (E&M) visits (-74%), new patient E&M visits (-70%), and established patient E&M visits (-60%). A decrease in billing frequency was observed for the top physician-administered oncology products, dropping in both April (-26%) and July (-31%). Mastectomies were reduced consistently in April through July, with colectomies similarly reduced in April and May and prostatectomies dipping in April and July. CONCLUSION: The current impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care in the United States has resulted in decreases and delays in identifying new cancers and delivery of treatment. These problems, if unmitigated, will increase cancer morbidity and mortality for years to come.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/cci.20.00134

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption to the cancer care system, including a shift to virtual appointments, alternative treatment offerings, postponement of surveillance scans and surgeries, and diminished supportive care and survivorship services.

    “In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption to the cancer care system, including a shift to virtual appointments, alternative treatment offerings, postponement of surveillance scans and surgeries, and diminished supportive care and survivorship services [6,7].”

    From The Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 on Older Adults with Cancer: A Rapid Review (2022) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Introduction (page not provided) describes a shift to telehealth, delayed surgeries, and guidance to begin systemic therapy before surgery. The Results and Discussion (page not provided) also document reduced cancer services and follow-up. Our copy does not establish postponement of surveillance scans or diminished supportive care and survivorship services; it describes the alternative treatment sequence as guidance, not a measured change in offerings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patt, D., Gordan, L., Diaz, M., Okon, T., Grady, L., Harmison, M., Markward, N., Sullivan, M., Peng, J., & Zhou, A.
Affiliations
  • Texas Oncology (US)
  • Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute (US)
  • Community Oncology Alliance (US)
  • Avalere Health, Washington, DC
Corresponding author
Patt, Debra
Venue
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
Published
2020-11
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
1059-1071
ISSN
2473-4276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3106631792
Cited by
646
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 151 · 2022: 177 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 2
FWCI
41.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, cancer care, cancer screening, delayed cancer diagnosis, cancer treatment disruption, fee-for-service Medicare, older adults, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, mastectomy, colectomy, prostatectomy, health care access, health insurance claims data
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Aged, Female, Medicare, Humans, Male, Medical Oncology, Neoplasms, United States, Early Detection of Cancer, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review