Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conceptual models of student attrition: How theory can help the institutional researcher

Bean, John P.·1982·New Directions for Institutional Research

Abstract

In the 1960s, the lack of theoretical models of student attrition was loudly decried. In the 1970s, several were proposed, and now the institutional reseacher has the opportunity to choose from among them.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ir.37019823604

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Bean, J. P.
Venue
New Directions for Institutional Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1982-12
Volume
1982
Issue
36
Pages
17-33
ISSN
  • 0271-0579 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-075X
OpenAlex
W2036171782
Cited by
200
References
1
FWCI
21.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptual models of student attrition: How theory can help the institutional researcher. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ir.37019823604
The paper
Bean, J. P. (1982). Conceptual models of student attrition: How theory can help the institutional researcher. New Directions for Institutional Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.37019823604

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.