Cited by 122Ubiquitin and proteasome pathwaysCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms

The SOCS box—Adapting proteins for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation

Linossi, Edmond M., Nicholson, Sandra E.·2012·IUBMB Life

Abstract

The s uppressor o f c ytokine s ignalling (SOCS) box was first identified in the SH2‐containing SOCS box family (cytokine‐inducible SH2‐containing protein, SOCS1–7) and is a 40‐amino acid motif, which functions to recruit an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex consisting of the adapter proteins elongins B and C, Rbx2 and the scaffold protein Cullin5. The SOCS box is found in a diverse array of intracellular signalling molecules, many of which contain different protein interaction domains such as SPRY and WD40 domains, leucine and ankyrin repeats or other functional domains such as GTPases. In general, the SOCS box‐containing proteins are thought to act as substrate‐recognition modules to mediate the polyubiquitination and subsequent degradation of substrate proteins by the 26S proteasome. © 2012 IUBMB Life, 64(4): 316–323, 2012

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/iub.1011

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another 37 E3 ligases use a SOCS-box domain to form Elongin B/C-containing complexes with Cullin 5.

    “Another 37 E3 ligases use a SOCS-box domain to form Elongin B/C-containing complexes with Cullin 5 (ref. 100 ).”

    From Targeted protein degradation: expanding the toolbox (2019) · cites this paper as [100]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Linossi, E. M., & Nicholson, S. E.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Nicholson, Sandra E.
Venue
IUBMB Life
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-23
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
316-323
ISSN
  • 1521-6543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-6551
OpenAlex
W2065346958
Cited by
122
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IUBMB Life (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • State Government of Victoria
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Keywords
SOCS box, suppressor of cytokine signaling, E3 ubiquitin ligase, RBX2, polyubiquitination, proteasomal degradation, 26S proteasome, substrate recognition, cytokine signaling, protein degradation
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Humans, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Ankyrin Repeat, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, src Homology Domains, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling Proteins, Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs, Ubiquitination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review