Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 593

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Microbiology of Primary Dental Caries in Humans

Tanzer, Jason M., Livingston, Jill, Thompson, Angela M.·2001·Journal of Dental Education

Abstract

A systematic literature review from 1966 to 2000 revealed 2,730 English‐language publications on the role of bacteria in human primary dental caries in vivo. The most pertinent 313 papers were analyzed in evidence tables accessible online (http://www.nidcr.nih.gov). The search targeted all bacterial types implicated previously in caries and asked two questions. First, what is the association of specific bacteria with tooth decay and can causation be attributed to any of those bacteria? Retrieved studies were categorized as randomized‐blinded‐interventional, longitudinal, case‐control, and cross‐sectional and were weighted in descending order in terms of significance. Although many studies, due to ethical requirements, had confounding variables, they still indicate strongly: 1) the central role of the mutans streptococci in initiation of caries of smooth surfaces and fissures of crowns of teeth and suggests their potent role in induction of root surface caries; and 2) that lactobacilli are implicated as important contributory bacteria in tooth decay, but their role in induction of lesions is not well supported. Second, what is the source of infection by cariogenic bacteria? Molecular/genetic studies of implicated bacteria isolated from humans, randomized‐blinded‐interventional, and longitudinal studies indicate that mutans streptococci are spread vertically among humans, mostly from mothers to their children. Implications of these conclusions are briefly discussed. The most significant problems of literature interpretation include the benefits/shortcomings of salivary and plaque monitoring of the flora, the role of sugar(s) in decay as it influences the flora, and modeling strategies to predict lesion score increments as distinct from determination of the etiological role of specific bacteria. Future directions for microbiological clinical caries research are suggested, and the use of the term “caries” to describe the disease, not its lesions, is urged.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2001.65.10.tb03446.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 593

Metadata

Authors
Tanzer, J. M., Livingston, J., & Thompson, A. M.
Venue
Journal of Dental Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-10
Volume
65
Issue
10
Pages
1028-1037
ISSN
  • 0022-0337 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7837
OpenAlex
W2261183707
Cited by
593
References
0
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Microbiology of Primary Dental Caries in Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2001.65.10.tb03446.x
The paper
Tanzer, J. M., Livingston, J., & Thompson, A. M. (2001). The Microbiology of Primary Dental Caries in Humans. Journal of Dental Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2001.65.10.tb03446.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.