The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
STARCH GEL ELECTROPHORESIS OF PLANT ISOZYMES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TECHNIQUES
Abstract
The use of genetic information expressed in isozymic form has enhanced our understanding of heritable variation within and among plant populations. For over three decades now, protein electrophoresis coupled with histochemical staining has provided data on the concordance of observable features in plants (e.g., morphology, cytology, ecological adaptation) with isozyme phenotypes. Yet inadequate dissemination of procedural details and varied investigative approaches have limited the comparative value of electrophoretic data and have made it difficult for novices to apply the technique to other experimental systems. Information gathered from over 25 laboratories utilizing enzyme electrophoresis is treated comparatively, providing access to protocols that often are either unpublished or widely dispersed in the literature. Analyzed in the review are methods and guidelines for enzyme extraction, effective storage of plant samples and buffers, efficient screening of taxa for enzymatic activity, and interpretation of diploid and polyploid banding patterns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ESTIMATION OF AVERAGE HETEROZYGOSITY AND GENETIC DISTANCE FROM A SMALL NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS
Nei, M. (1978) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/89.3.583 · Cited by 11,381
Handbook of enzyme electrophoresis in human genetics
Harris, H., & Hopkinson, D. A. (1976) · Cited by 2,231
Soltis, D. E., Haufler, C. H., Darrow, D. C., & Gastony, G. J. (1983) · American Fern Journal · doi:10.2307/1546611 · Cited by 1,394
Toward a General Theory of Plant Antiherbivore Chemistry
Rhoades, D. F., & Cates, R. G. (1976) · Biochemical Interaction Between Plants and Insects · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2646-5_4 · Cited by 1,181
Visualization and Interpretation of Plant Isozymes
Wendel, J. F., & Weeden, N. F. (1989) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1840-5_2 · Cited by 1,170
MULTIPLE FORMS OF ENZYMES: TISSUE, ONTOGENETIC, AND SPECIES SPECIFIC PATTERNS
Markert, C. L., & Møller, F. (1959) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.45.5.753 · Cited by 1,072
Hamrick, J. L., Linhart, Y. B., & Mitton, J. B. (1979) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.001133 · Cited by 866
A new apparatus for electrophoretic analysis of colloidal mixtures
Tiselius, A. (1937) · Transactions of the Faraday Society · doi:10.1039/tf9373300524 · Cited by 854
[54] Overcoming problems of phenolics and quinones in the isolation of plant enzymes and organelles
Loomis, W. D. (1974) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/0076-6879(74)31057-9 · Cited by 598
Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations
Brown, A. H. D. (1979) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(79)90025-x · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Kephart, S. R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-05
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 693-712
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W1966754650
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 6.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STARCH GEL ELECTROPHORESIS OF PLANT ISOZYMES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TECHNIQUES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1990.tb14456.x
- The paper
- Kephart, S. R. (1990). STARCH GEL ELECTROPHORESIS OF PLANT ISOZYMES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TECHNIQUES. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1990.tb14456.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
