Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Participatory Spatial Information Management and Communication in Developing Countries

Open access
Rambaldi, Giacomo, Kyem, Peter A Kwaku, McCall, Mike, Weiner, Daniel·2006·THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Abstract

The participatory creation of maps, above and beyond their interpretation, started in the late 1980s.At that time, development practitioners were inclined to adopt Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) methods such as sketch mapping (Mascarenhas et al. 1991) rather than the more complex and time consuming scale mapping.Preference was given to eliciting local knowledge and building on local dynamics to facilitate communication between insiders (e.g.villagers) and outsiders (e.g.researchers, government officials, etc.).This approach placed little emphasis on charting courses of action that would enable ordinary people to interact efficiently with policymakers (Rambaldi 2005).The situation was further compounded by state control of aerial photography, satellite imagery and large-scale topographic maps under the pretext of national security concerns.The state of affairs in mapping changed in the '90s, with the diffusion of modern spatial information technologies (including geographic information systems (GIS), global positioning systems (GPS), remote sensing image analysis software and open access to spatial data and imagery via the Internet into the industry.With the steadily decreasing cost of computer hardware and the availability of user-friendly software, spatial data that were previously controlled by government institutions became progressively more accessible 2 to, and mastered by non-governmental and community-based organisations, minority groups and sectors of society traditionally disenfranchised and excluded from spatial decision making processes (Fox et al. 2003).The new environment facilitated the integration of geo-spatial information technologies and systems (GIT&S) into community-centred initiatives.GIT practitioners and researchers around the world were able to adopt a range of GIT&S to integrate multiple realities and diverse forms of information with the objective of empowering underprivileged groups, promote social learning, support two-way communication and thereby broaden public participation across socio-economic contexts, locations and sectors.This merging of community development with geo-spatial technologies for the empowerment of less privileged communities has come to be known as Participatory Geographic Information Systems or PGIS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00162.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Metadata

Authors
Rambaldi, G., Kyem, P. A. K., McCall, M., & Weiner, D.
Venue
THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
1681-4835 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104935957
Cited by
286
References
11
FWCI
41.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Participatory Spatial Information Management and Communication in Developing Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00162.x
The paper
Rambaldi, G., Kyem, P. A. K., McCall, M., & Weiner, D. (2006). Participatory Spatial Information Management and Communication in Developing Countries. THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00162.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.