The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Community participation and geographic information systems
Abstract
Geographic information systems (GIS) and geographic information technologies (GIT) are increasingly employed in research and development projects that incorporate community participation. For example, there are now applications involving indigenous natural resource mapping in arctic and tropical regions within the Americas (Marozas 1993; Cultural Survival Quarterly 1995; Bond, this volume). There is also a rapidly growing network of planning professionals interested in how GIS can merge with community participation in the context of neighbourhood revitalization and urban planning (Aitken and Michel 1995; Craig and Elwood 1998; Leitner et al., this volume; Sawicki and Peterman, this volume; Talen 1999; 2000). Environmental groups are experimenting with community GIS applications to promote environmental equity and address environmental racism (Sieber 2000; Kellogg 1999). Furthermore, NGOs, aid organizations, and governmental agencies are linking communities with GIS as they seek to promote more popular and sustainable development projects (Dunn et al. 1997; Elwood and Leitner 1998; Gonzales 1995; Harris et al. 1995; Hutchinson and Toledano 1993; Jordan and Shrestha 1998; Kwaku-Kyem 1999; Mitchell 1997; Obermeyer and Pinto 1994; Rambaldi and Callosa 2000; Weiner et al. 1995; Weiner and Harris 1999).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Participatory GIS — a people's GIS?
Dunn, C. E. (2007) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132507081493 · Cited by 573
Chapin, M., Lamb, Z., & Threlkeld, B. (2005) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120429 · Cited by 470
Triangulation and Mixed Methods Designs: Data Integration With New Research Technologies
Fielding, N. G. (2012) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689812437101 · Cited by 447
Volunteered Geographic Information: the nature and motivation of produsers
Coleman, D., Georgiadou, Y., & Labonte, J. (2009) · University of Twente Research Information · doi:10.2902/1725-0463.2009.04.art16 · Cited by 396
The matter of ‘virtual’ geographies
Kinsley, S. (2014) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132513506270 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Venue
- Community Participation and Geographical Information Systems
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 2002-04-04
- Pages
- 29-42
- OpenAlex
- W1492309934
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 240.59
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community participation and geographic information systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9780203469484-8
- The paper
- Community participation and geographic information systems. (2002). Community Participation and Geographical Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203469484-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.