Cited by 26Pacific and Southeast Asian StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesAmazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory

Microfossils of introduced starch cultigens from an early wetland ditch in New Zealand

Horrocks, Mark, Barber, Ian·2005·Archaeology in Oceania

Abstract

Pollen, phytolith and starch residue analyses of a wetland ditch at Motutangi, far northern New Zealand reveals evidence of early environment and introduced cultigens. During the period of use or infilling, local vegetation largely comprised Gleichenia-Restionaceae swamp and disturbed forest. Starch residues of Colocasia esculenta (taro), Dioscorea sp. (yam) and Ipomoea sp. (possibly I. batatas, sweet potato) are identified, here, and suggest that the ditch systems of far northern New Zealand may have been used for extensive cultivation of taro and other crops. The results include the first direct evidence of Dioscorea in ancient Polynesia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.1834-4453.2005.tb00596.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Palaeoecologists have usually understood drainage ditches to have generally negative impacts on the preservation of palaeoecological records, although if abandoned and silted-up, they can provide excellent ecological records spanning centuries to millennia.

    “Similarly, palaeoecologists have usually understood drainage ditches to have generally negative impacts on the preservation of palaeoecological records although, if abandoned and silted-up, they can provide excellent ecological records spanning centuries to millennia [64][65][66] .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [64]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horrocks, M., & Barber, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Venue
Archaeology in Oceania
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
106-114
ISSN
  • 0003-8121 (ISSN-L)
  • 0728-4896
OpenAlex
W2032248330
Cited by
26
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
16.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Archaeology in Oceania/Archæology & physical anthropology in Oceania (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
Keywords
taro, yam, Ipomoea batatas, Ipomoea, crop domestication, paleoecology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review