The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cavernous Neurotomy Causes Hypoxia and Fibrosis in Rat Corpus Cavernosum
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The etiologies of erectile dysfunction (ED) after nerve‐sparing radical prostatectomy have not been clearly elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of cavernous nerve injury on cavernous fibrosis, and to consider measures to prevent irreversible damage to the cavernous tissues. Twenty male Sprague‐Dawley rats constituted the study population. The animals were divided into 2 groups; group 1 consisted of sham‐operated rats (n = 10), and group 2 consisted of rats that underwent incision of both cavernous nerves (n = 10). Three months later, all rats underwent intracavernous papaverine injection (300 and 600 mg), and intracorporal pressures were recorded. Transforming growth factor‐β 1 (TGF‐β 1) messenger RNA (mRNA) expression from rat penile tissue was measured using reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction. Hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α (HIF‐1α), TGF‐β 1, and collagen I and III protein expressions were determined by Western blot analysis and immunohistochemical staining. Erectile function as studied with intracavernosal papaverine injection and histological analysis of penile cross‐sections at 3 months was similar in both groups. TGF‐β 1 mRNA expression, HIF‐1α, TGF‐β 1, and collagen I and III protein expressions were significantly greater in the neurotomy group. Immunohistochemical staining for TGF‐β 1, HIF‐1α, and collagen III were qualitatively more positive in the neurotomy group, whereas collagen I staining was similar. This study demonstrates an increase in TGF‐β 1, HIF‐1α, and collagen III synthesis in rat cavernosal smooth musculature after cavernous neurotomies. In theory, cavernous fibrosis may be reduced by employing various vasoactive agents or interventions that increase oxygenation to the corporal tissues during the postoperative period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yafi, F. A., Jenkins, L., Albersen, M., Corona, G., Isidori, A. M., Goldfarb, S., Maggi, M., Nelson, C. J., Parish, S., Salonia, A., et al. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.3 · Cited by 853
Hypoxia and the hypoxia-inducible-factor pathway in glioma growth and angiogenesis
Kaur, B., Khwaja, F. W., Severson, E. A., Matheny, S. L., Brat, D. J., & Van Meir, E. G. (2005) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1215/s1152851704001115 · Cited by 725
Gonzalez-Cadavid, N. F. (2009) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01195.x · Cited by 172
Rambhatla, A., Kovanecz, I., Ferrini, M., Gonzalez-Cadavid, N. F., & Rajfer, J. (2008) · International Journal of Impotence Research · doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901588 · Cited by 51
Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: does it work?
(2015) · PubMed Central · doi:10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.02.01 · Cited by 40
Piao, S., Choi, M. J., Tumurbaatar, M., Kim, W. J., Jin, H.-R., Shin, S. H., Tuvshintur, B., Yin, G. N., Song, J. S., Kwon, M.-H., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01753.x · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Leungwattanakij, S., Bivalacqua, T. J., Usta, M. F., Yang, D., Hyun, J., Champion, H. C., Abdel‐Mageed, A. B., & Hellstrom, W. J. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Andrology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-245
- ISSN
- 0196-3635 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-4640
- OpenAlex
- W1605189746
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.