CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 208Mental Health and PsychiatryCultural Competency in Health CareCultural, Psychoanalytic, and Sociopolitical Reflections

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Culture, cultural factors and psychiatric diagnosis: review and projections

Open access
ALARCÓN, RENATO D.·2009·World Psychiatry
DOI 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2009.tb00233.xPMC PMC2755270
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Culture, cultural factors and psychiatric diagnosis: review and projectionsDiagnosis is probably the dominant topic of discussion and debate in the psychiatric field today.The announcement of the publication of new editions of the two best known classifications, the DSM-V and the ICD-11, for 2012 and 2014 respectively, has generated a predictable, at times heated exchange of opinions, suggestions, criticisms, and research initiatives.A variety of activities (conferences, meetings, symposia) across the world, and joint declarations of harmonious work at the international level, have kept a momentum that, most likely, will not cease until long after the actual publications.It is expected that the new nomenclatures will incorporate significant changes in structure, diagnostic modalities, clinical evaluation approaches, definition and scope of disorders, and measurements of severity and level of functioning.Contributions from neurosciences and social sciences, clinical and epidemiological research, and a public health perspective will hopefully be included at realistic levels.Last but not least, national government agencies, insurance companies, the pharmaceutical industry, and worldwide medical and professional organizations as well as the public at large are keeping a close eye on the whole process (1-3).The cultural perspective on psychiatric diagnosis has experienced uneven levels of reception and actual implementation (4), in spite of uniform pronouncements from the leading bodies of organized psychiatry and mental health across the world, professing respect and due consideration of cultural factors in the elaboration of previous, current, and future nomenclatures.Assuming the sincerity of such statements, this article will attempt an objective examination of why, what, how and when should culture be an integral part of diagnosis in psychiatry.After a brief review of general basic concepts of diagnosis, the paper will focus on history, evolution and current status of the two main classification systems in today's psychiatry.An examination of basic concepts of culture and cultural factors in psychiatric diagnosis will, then, be fol-

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2009.tb00233.x

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Kirmayer LJ, 2003, Psychiatry, 19
  2. Regier DA, 2005, Psychopathology in the genome and neurosciences era, 85
  3. Favazza AR, 1984, Cultural psychopathology, 15
  4. Alarcón RD, 2000, What cultural psychiatry is not, Psychline, 3, 15
  5. Lewis‐Fernández R, 2000, Los “sindromes dependientes de la cultura”; un dilema nosológico recurrente en la psiquiatría cultural, Monogr Psiquiatría, 12, 24
  6. Kupfer DJ, 2002, A research agenda for DSM V
  7. Alarcón RD, 2007, Genética y farmacogenómica en psiquiatría, 59
  8. Duckworth K, 2003, Psychiatry, 2289
  9. Hughes CC, 1995, Review of psychiatry, 565
  10. Eades JM, 2004, Gambling addiction: the problem, the pain and the path to recovery

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 207

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
ALARCÓN, R. D.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
ALARCÓN, RENATO D.
ORCID
ALARCÓN, RENATO D.
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
131-139
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
DOI
10.1002/j.2051-5545.2009.tb00233.x
PMC
PMC2755270
OpenAlex
W1704517559
Cited by
208
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
76.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 1258 d)
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural, Psychoanalytic, and Sociopolitical Reflections
Keywords
psychiatric classification, DSM-5, ICD-11, diagnostic terminology, history of psychiatric diagnosis, cross-cultural psychiatry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review