Cited by 1,074Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental HealthMental Health and Patient Involvement

Self-stigma and the “why try” effect: impact on life goals and evidence-based practices

Open access
CORRIGAN, PATRICK W., LARSON, JONATHON E., RÜSCH, NICOLAS·2009·World Psychiatry

Abstract

Many individuals with mental illnesses are troubled by self-stigma and the subsequent processes that accompany this stigma: low self-esteem and self-efficacy. "Why try" is the overarching phenomenon of interest here, encompassing self-stigma, mediating processes, and their effect on goal-related behavior. In this paper, the literature that explains "why try" is reviewed, with special focus on social psychological models. Self-stigma comprises three steps: awareness of the stereotype, agreement with it, and applying it to one's self. As a result of these processes, people suffer reduced self-esteem and self-efficacy. People are dissuaded from pursuing the kind of opportunities that are fundamental to achieving life goals because of diminished self-esteem and self-efficacy. People may also avoid accessing and using evidence-based practices that help achieve these goals. The effects of self-stigma and the "why try" effect can be diminished by services that promote consumer empowerment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2009.tb00218.x

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hilton JL, von Hippel W. Stereotypes. Ann Rev Psychol 1996;47: 237-71.
  2. Rosenfield S, Neese-Todd S. Why model programs work: factors predicting the subjective quality of life of the chronic mentally ill. Hosp Commun Psychiatry 1993;44:76-8.
  3. Bandura A. The anatomy of stages of change. Am J Health Prom 1997;12:8-10.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CORRIGAN, P. W., LARSON, J. E., & RÜSCH, N.
Affiliations
Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
75-81
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W1498823917
Cited by
1,074
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 23
FWCI
23.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
self-stigma, mental illness, life goals, self-esteem, self-efficacy, evidence-based practice, consumer empowerment, stigma awareness, social-psychological model, help-seeking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review