Cited by 381Career Development and DiversityDisability Education and EmploymentHigher Education and Employability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Social Cognitive Framework for Career Choice Counseling

Brown, Steven D., Lent, Robert W.·1996·The Career Development Quarterly

Abstract

This article extends social cognitive career theory by suggesting how several of its major hypotheses can be applied to counseling persons with career choice difficulties. Several theory‐derived counseling strategies are described that can be used to assist clients in developing a broad array of career options, analyzing and overcoming barriers to career choice, and counteracting choice‐limiting self‐efficacy beliefs. Each strategy is illustrated with a case example. Future research needs related to the counseling model are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.2161-0045.1996.tb00451.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Bandura A., 1986, Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory
  2. Bennett G. K., 1990, Differential Aptitude Tests, fifth edition
  3. Campbell D., 1989, Manual for the Campbell Interest and Skill Survey
  4. Dawis R. V., 1987, Minnesota Occupational Classification System III
  5. Dawis R. V., 1984, A psychological theory of work adjustment
  6. 10.1037/0022-0167.37.2.169 · DOI
  7. Harmon L. W., 1977, Psychotherapy for women
  8. Harmon L. W., 1994, Applications and technical guide to the Strong Interest Inventory
  9. Janis I. L., 1977, Decision making
  10. Mitchell L. K., 1990, Career choice and development: Applying contemporary theories to practice, 145
  11. Osipow S. H., 1989, The Task Specific Scale of Self‐Efficacy
  12. Rounds J. B., 1981, Manual for the Minnesota Importance Questionnaire
  13. U.S. Department of Labor., 1970, Manual for the General Aptitude Test Battery
  14. U.S. Department of Labor., 1981, Selected characteristics of occupations defined in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 381

Metadata

Authors
Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Steven D.
Venue
The Career Development Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-06
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
354-366
ISSN
  • 0889-4019 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-0045
OpenAlex
W2153163178
Cited by
381
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
FWCI
45.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Career Development Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
Keywords
social cognitive career theory, career paths, career barriers, self-efficacy, counseling techniques, career development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review