The effects of mathematics task performance on math self-efficacy and task interest
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior studies indicated that self-efficacy increased when students were exposed to successful learning opportunities.
“Each of these studies indicated that selfefficacy increased when students were exposed to successful learning opportunities.”
From The Effects of Online Homework on Achievement and Self-efficacy of College Algebra Students (2009) · cites this paper as Campbell & Hackett, 1986
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A social cognitive framework for career choice counseling
Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1996) · The Career Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.1996.tb00451.x · Cited by 381 · see citing works
The relation of self-efficacy and interests: a meta-analysis of 60 samples
Rottinghaus, P. J., Larson, L. M., & Borgen, F. H. (2003) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0001-8791(02)00039-8 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Evaluation of an Intervention to Increase Realistic Self-Efficacy and Interests in College Women
Betz, N. E., & Schifano, R. S. (2000) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.1999.1690 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Leadership efficacy and women leaders' responses to stereotype activation
Hoyt, C. L., & Blascovich, J. (2007) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430207084718 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
The Effects of Online Homework on Achievement and Self-efficacy of College Algebra Students
Brewer, D. S. (2009) · Utah State University · doi:10.26076/e6cf-1985 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Campbell, N. K., & Hackett, G.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hackett, Gail
- Venue
- Journal of Vocational Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1986-04
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-162
- ISSN
- 0001-8791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991703343
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Vocational Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- mathematics self-efficacy, task interest, self-evaluation of performance, numerical series, gender differences, attribution of success and failure, self-efficacy theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
