Cited by 21Disability Education and EmploymentCareer Development and DiversityRetirement, Disability, and Employment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stuck in a Loop: Individual and System Barriers for Job Seekers With Disabilities

Open access
Hall, Jean P., Parker, Kathy·2010·The Career Development Quarterly

Abstract

Research conducted within Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996) and Workforce Investment Act of 1998 systems indicates pervasive issues hindering program effectiveness for job seekers with disabilities. This population frequently experiences employment barriers beyond those of able‐bodied job seekers, including significantly lower self‐esteem. Service providers need and want information about disability but do not know how to obtain it. Program staff and job seekers with disabilities get stuck in a loop wherein each questions their ability and neither feels empowered to make meaningful changes to improve outcomes. Career counselors may need to expand their role to be more culturally relevant for these clients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2010.tb00190.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.8 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.194 · DOI
  3. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  4. Debus M., 1988, Methodological review: A handbook for excellence in focus group research
  5. Erickson W., 2008, 2007 disability status report: United States
  6. 10.1177/001440299305900602 · DOI
  7. Hoff D., 2001, Access for all: A resource manual for meeting the needs of One‐Stop customers with disabilities
  8. Johnson D. R., 2007, Raising disability awareness and self‐efficacy of One‐Stop workforce center staff serving job seekers with disabilities., The Preview of Disability Studies: An International Journal, 3, 24
  9. Joiner J., 1989, Positive assertion and acceptance among persons with disabilities., The Journal of Rehabilitation, 55, 22
  10. 10.1080/15265160600860886 · DOI
  11. 10.1037/10518-189 · DOI
  12. Lee R., 2003, Serving the “hard‐to‐serve”: The use of clinical knowledge in welfare reform., Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 30, 59
  13. 10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.439 · DOI
  14. Mellard D., 2001, Responding to specific learning disabilities in Welfare‐to‐Work clients and in the employment setting: Project final report
  15. 10.4135/9781412984287 · DOI · Paper page
  16. National Center on Workforce and Disability., 2002, OneStops.info briefs, 1.
  17. National Council on Disability., 2002, National disability policy: A policy report
  18. National Opinion Research Center., 1988, National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988: First follow‐up student questionnaire (Office of Management and Budget No. 1850–0593)
  19. Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 P. L. No. 104–193 110 Stat. 2110 (1996). · DOI
  20. 10.1177/0146167201272002 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Rosenberg M., 1979, Conceiving of the self
  22. 10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_3 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Storen D., 2002, One‐Stop accessibility: A nationwide survey of One‐Stop centers on services for people with disabilities
  24. Szymanski E., 1994, Castification of people with disabilities: Potential disempowering aspects of classification in disability services., Journal of Rehabilitation, 60, 12
  25. Timmons J., 2001, Characteristics of effective employment services: The consumers' perspective
  26. 10.1037/0090-5550.49.3.241 · DOI
  27. U.S. Department of Labor., 2007, Disability program “navigator” initiative
  28. U.S. Department of Labor., 2007, DOL annual report, fiscal year 2005
  29. U.S. General Accounting Office., 2002, Workforce Investment Act: Coordination of TANF services through One‐Stops has increased despite challenges (GAO‐02‐739T)
  30. 10.4135/9781452243641 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2003.tb00635.x · DOI
  32. 10.1037/10589-000 · DOI
  33. Yin R., 1994, Case study research: Design and methods

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hall, J. P., & Parker, K.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Hall, Jean P.
Venue
The Career Development Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
246-256
ISSN
  • 0889-4019 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-0045
OpenAlex
W2133706376
Cited by
21
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Career Development Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • KU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
job seekers with disabilities, barriers to employment, TANF, Workforce Investment Act, self-esteem, program effectiveness, career guidance, empowerment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review