The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teams that Work: Campus Culture, Engineer Identity, and Social Interactions
Abstract
Not all student teams are created equal. Some manage to produce excellent engineering results, others fabricate it. Social interactions in some teams are respectful, while on other teams some members expect others to carry the load, but take credit for it later. With engineering teamwork becoming more prevalent on engineering campuses, knowing more about student design teams that work is especially important. This article uses two teamwork cases from a large-scale ethnographic study of an engineering design program to describe not only the ways that student engineers practiced design teamwork, but also how campus culture reached into social interactions between teammates via engineering identities produced on campus. A model for effective teamwork emerged that implies producing high quality engineering products, and doing so through respectful social interactions. Implications for teaching about teamwork, teaching with teams, and thinking about ways to change campus cultures to better promote design engineering are developed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Educated in Romance: Women, Achievement, and College Culture
Holland, D. C., Eisenhart, M. A., & Connell, R. W. (1990) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226218496.001.0001 · Cited by 444
Cited by
Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education
Borrego, M., Douglas, E. P., & Amelink, C. T. (2009) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x · Cited by 770
Borrego, M., Karlin, J., McNair, L. D., & Beddoes, K. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20023 · Cited by 330
Enriching gender in physics education research: A binary past and a complex future
Traxler, A. L., Cid, X. C., Blue, J., & Barthelemy, R. (2016) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.12.020114 · Cited by 172
The Role of Robotics Teams’ Collaboration Quality on Team Performance in a Robotics Tournament
Menekse, M., Higashi, R., Schunn, C. D., & Baehr, E. (2017) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20178 · Cited by 80
When Critical Ethnography Leaves the Field and Enters the Engineering Classroom: A Scoping Review
Masta, S., & Secules, S. (2021) · Studies in Engineering Education · doi:10.21061/see.26 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Tonso, K. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-37
- ISSN
- 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005006615
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 142.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teams that Work: Campus Culture, Engineer Identity, and Social Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00875.x
- The paper
- Tonso, K. L. (2006). Teams that Work: Campus Culture, Engineer Identity, and Social Interactions. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00875.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.