The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple Perspectives on Engaging Future Engineers
Abstract
Background: Engaging future engineers is a central topic in everyday conversations on engineering education. Considerable investments have been made to make engineering more engaging, recruit and retain aspiring engineers, and to design an education to prepare future engineers. However, the impact of these efforts has been less than intended. It is imperative that the community reflects on progress and sets a more effective path for the future. Purpose: The purpose of this article is to map a new innovation landscape for what it means to engage future engineers. This is a theoretically grounded divergent‐thinking effort to enable a broader space of high impact innovations for engaging future engineers. Scope/Method: A multiple perspectives methodology drawing from innovation, cross‐disciplinary, and boundary work frameworks was used to make visible multiple facets of engaging future engineers. Scholars from diverse communities of thought and discourse were selected to present interparadigmatic perspectives, act as boundary agents, challenge and transform current ways of thinking, and illustrate new opportunities for engineering education innovation. Conclusions: A new innovation landscape for engaging future engineers is needed, one that emphasizes epistemological development and social justice, new configurations on engineering thinking and connecting to the formative years of development, the entwinement of engineering knowing and being, and mutually informing consequences for opening up a broader space for innovation. We also need to adopt strategies and tools for using a multiple perspectives approach to better understand complex engineering education problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338 · cited 1×
“The second assumption is that the problem of “engaging future engineers” is complex, a “wicked” problem (Rittel & Webber, 1973) encompassing a complex network of ideas and communities of thought.”
BackgroundHutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801
Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027 · Cited by 7,715
Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action
Lin, N. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815447 · Cited by 4,535
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry
Longino, H. E. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9780691209753 · Cited by 3,092
Longino, H. E. (2002) · doi:10.1515/9780691187013 · Cited by 1,622
Advancing engineering education in P–12 classrooms
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x · Cited by 910
Cited by
Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences
Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.x · Cited by 428
Borrego, M., Karlin, J., McNair, L. D., & Beddoes, K. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20023 · Cited by 330
Engineering Instructional Development: Programs, Best Practices, and Recommendations
Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Prince, M. J. (2011) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00005.x · Cited by 259
Darmawansah, D., Hwang, G.-J., Chen, M.-R. A., & Liang, J.-C. (2023) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-023-00400-3 · Cited by 147
“Similarly, recent studies have reported that the use of robots in school settings has an impact on student curiosity (Adams et al., 2011), arts and craftwork (Sullivan & Bers, 2016), and logic (Bers, 2008).”
BackgroundÇetin, M., & Demircan, H. Ö. (2020) · Early Child Development and Care · doi:10.1080/03004430.2018.1534844 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, R., Evangelou, D., English, L., De Figueiredo, A. D., Mousoulides, N., Pawley, A. L., Schiefellite, C., Stevens, R., Svinicki, M., Trenor, J. M., & Wilson, D. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-88
- ISSN
- 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-9830
- OpenAlex
- W1992888463
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 375.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Perspectives on Engaging Future Engineers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00004.x
- The paper
- Adams, R., Evangelou, D., English, L., De Figueiredo, A. D., Mousoulides, N., Pawley, A. L., Schiefellite, C., Stevens, R., Svinicki, M., Trenor, J. M., & Wilson, D. M. (2011). Multiple Perspectives on Engaging Future Engineers. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00004.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.