Cited by 1,622Epistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsFeminist Epistemology and Gender StudiesEducation, Politics, and Culture Studies

The Fate of Knowledge

Longino, Helen E.·2002·Princeton University Press eBooks

Abstract

Preface and Acknowledgments ix Chapter One: Introduction: The Rational-Social Dichotomy 1 Chapter Two: Taking Social Studies of Science Seriously 11 Chapter Three: The Philosophers Respond 42 Chapter Four: Disassembling the Rational-Social Dichotomy 77 Chapter Five: Socializing Cognition 97 Chapter Six: Socializing Knowledge 124 Chapter Seven: Clarifications and Responses 145 Chapter Eight: Pluralism and Local Epistemolgies 175 Chapter Nine: Conclusion 203 References 215 Index 227

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9780691187013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Value judgments are required to set evidential thresholds, and if the agent is transparent about their judgment, consistently applies their threshold as new data emerges, and stays open to revising their stance, the resulting value-laden belief is unproblematic.

    “Many philosophers of science hold that these value judgments are required to set evidential thresholds and if the agent is transparent about their judgment, consistently applies their threshold as new data emerges, and stays open to revising their stance, the resulting value-laden belief is unproblematic (e.g., Longino, 2002;Elliot & Richards, 2017).”

    From Are Attributions of Consciousness to AI Chatbots Epistemically Innocent? (2026) · cites this paper as Longino, 2002

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Longino, H. E.
Corresponding author
Longino, Helen E.
Venue
Princeton University Press eBooks
Published
2002-12-31
OpenAlex
W1559582138
Cited by
1,622
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 141 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 104 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 59
FWCI
70.28
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, Politics, and Culture Studies
Keywords
social studies of science, knowledge socialization, philosophy of science, epistemology, local epistemologies, pluralism, sociology of knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review