The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Problem‐based Learning: Influence on Students' Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course
Abstract
Background: Recently, there has been a shift from using lecture‐based teaching methods in undergraduate engineering courses to using more learner‐centered teaching approaches, such as problem‐based learning. However, research on the impact of these approaches has mainly involved student perceptions of the teaching method and anecdotal and opinion pieces by faculty on their use of the teaching method, rather than empirically collected data on students' learning outcomes. Purpose (Hypothesis): This paper describes an investigation of the impact of problem‐based learning (PBL) on undergraduate electrical engineering students' conceptual understanding and their perceptions of learning using PBL as compared to lecture. Design/Method: Fifty‐five students enrolled in an electrical engineering course at a Midwestern university participated in this research. The study utilized a within‐subjects A‐B‐A‐B research design with traditional lecture as the baseline phase and problem‐based learning as the experimental phase of the study. Participants completed pre‐ and post‐tests surrounding the four topics covered in the study and also completed a Student Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG) survey. Result: Results suggested participants' learning gains from PBL were twice their gains from traditional lecture. Even though students learned more from PBL, students thought they learned more from traditional lecture. We discuss these findings and offer implications for faculty interested in implementing PBL. Conclusion: Given the limited research on the beneficial effects of PBL on student learning, this study provides empirical support for PBL. We discuss findings from this study and provide specific implications for faculty and researchers interested in problem‐based learning in engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
(1990) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,269
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,395
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645 · cited 1×
“Brown, Collins, and Duguid (1989) further emphasized that unless knowledge is developed in the context in which it is to be used, students will gain an understanding of abstract concepts, algorithms, and procedures; thus, the knowledge remains inert and students are unable to use it.”
BackgroundDewey, J. (1986) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131728609335764 · Cited by 13,432
Statistical Methods for Psychology.
Gudgeon, A. C., & Howell, D. C. (1994) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2348956 · Cited by 8,278
Introduction to research in education
Ary, D. (1972) · Cited by 7,699
Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research
Prince, M. (2004) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x · Cited by 7,334 · cited 3×
“Problem-based learning in engineering is a natural fit since it espouses developing students’ ability to solve ill-defined problems, increasing critical thinking skills, and broadening their communication skills (Johnson, 1999; Prince, 2004).”
BackgroundKatuna, A., Dewey, J., Schneider, F., Dickerman, W., Stephan, A. S., Sorenson, H., & Hart, J. K. (1938) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2084758 · Cited by 6,905
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application
Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,395
Cited by
Fidan, M., & Tuncel, M. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103635 · Cited by 459
Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning in Engineering Education: Merging Models
Kolmos, A., & de Graaff, E. (2014) · Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139013451.012 · Cited by 288
Emerging learning environments in engineering education
Hadgraft, R. G., & Kolmos, A. (2020) · Australasian Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/22054952.2020.1713522 · Cited by 268
Watson, M. K., Noyes, C., & Rodgers, M. O. (2013) · Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice · doi:10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000156 · Cited by 75
Kolb’s experiential learning for vocational education in mechanical engineering: A review
Pamungkas, S. F., Widiastuti, I., & Suharno (2019) · AIP Conference Proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.5112427 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., & Bunting, C. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 253-280
- ISSN
- 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-9830
- OpenAlex
- W2137085812
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 82.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Problem‐based Learning: Influence on Students' Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00013.x
- The paper
- Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., & Bunting, C. F. (2011). Problem‐based Learning: Influence on Students' Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00013.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.