Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 416

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Problem‐based Learning: Influence on Students' Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course

Yadav, Aman, Subedi, Dipendra, Lundeberg, Mary A., Bunting, Charles F.·2011·Journal of Engineering Education

Abstract

Background: Recently, there has been a shift from using lecture‐based teaching methods in undergraduate engineering courses to using more learner‐centered teaching approaches, such as problem‐based learning. However, research on the impact of these approaches has mainly involved student perceptions of the teaching method and anecdotal and opinion pieces by faculty on their use of the teaching method, rather than empirically collected data on students' learning outcomes. Purpose (Hypothesis): This paper describes an investigation of the impact of problem‐based learning (PBL) on undergraduate electrical engineering students' conceptual understanding and their perceptions of learning using PBL as compared to lecture. Design/Method: Fifty‐five students enrolled in an electrical engineering course at a Midwestern university participated in this research. The study utilized a within‐subjects A‐B‐A‐B research design with traditional lecture as the baseline phase and problem‐based learning as the experimental phase of the study. Participants completed pre‐ and post‐tests surrounding the four topics covered in the study and also completed a Student Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG) survey. Result: Results suggested participants' learning gains from PBL were twice their gains from traditional lecture. Even though students learned more from PBL, students thought they learned more from traditional lecture. We discuss these findings and offer implications for faculty interested in implementing PBL. Conclusion: Given the limited research on the beneficial effects of PBL on student learning, this study provides empirical support for PBL. We discuss findings from this study and provide specific implications for faculty and researchers interested in problem‐based learning in engineering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00013.x

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Cited by

See all 416

Metadata

Authors
Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., & Bunting, C. F.
Venue
Journal of Engineering Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04
Volume
100
Issue
2
Pages
253-280
ISSN
  • 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-9830
OpenAlex
W2137085812
Cited by
416
References
55
FWCI
82.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Problem‐based Learning: Influence on Students' Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00013.x
The paper
Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., & Bunting, C. F. (2011). Problem‐based Learning: Influence on Students' Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00013.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.