The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning in Engineering Education: Merging Models
Open accessAbstract
Introduction In the practice of engineering education, there is a wide variety of implementations of problem-based or project-based learning (PBL). In this chapter we aim to explain the relationships between different types of problem-based and project-based learning to help teachers and educational managers make innovative choices and provide benchmarks for educational researchers. We present a combined understanding of problem- and project-based learning, the theoretical and historical background, and the different models of PBL that can capture the existing practices, ranging from small- to large-scale practice, from classroom teaching to institutional models, and from single-subject to interdisciplinary and complex knowledge construction. It is well known that one-way dissemination of knowledge by means of lectures is not very effective in achieving learning (van der Vleuten, 1997). In higher education concepts such as “self-directed-learning,” “case-based learning,” “inquiry based learning,” “experiential learning,” “service learning,” “project-based service learning,” “active learning,” CDIO (Conceive, Design, Implement, and Operate), “project-based learning,” and “problem-based learning” were introduced in the decades after the Second World War. All these new learning concepts come under the umbrella of learner-centered or student-centered learning models. Problem-based and project-based learning, both known as PBL, originate from the reform universities, and the new educational models, established between 1965 and 1975. In problem-based learning, problems form the starting point for students’ learning emphasizing a self-directed learning process in teams. The educational model problem-based learning was introduced at curriculum scale at the medical faculty of McMaster University, Canada, followed by Maastricht University in the Netherlands and many others. Project-based learning shares the aspect of students working on problems in teams, but with the added component that they have to submit a project report completed collaboratively by the project team. The problem- and project-based/project organized model adopted at Aalborg University and Roskilde University, Denmark, was inspired by the critical pedagogy in Europe after the student revolts of the 1960s. At Aalborg University both models of PBL were eventually combined in problem-based project organized learning, which was practiced at all faculties – the Faculty of Engineering and Science being the largest. This combined approach is the central point of reference for this chapter, as the pedagogical development in engineering education indicates that both educational practices are successful in their own way and the abbreviation PBL is here defined as including both practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1983) · Cited by 33,192
Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity
Wenger, E. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803932 · Cited by 23,500
Dewey, J. (1986) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131728609335764 · Cited by 13,432
Educating the reflective practitioner
Schön, D. A. (1987) · Cited by 11,326
The New Meaning of Educational Change
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203609071 · Cited by 8,220
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 · Cited by 7,776
The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4463 · Cited by 7,046
Katuna, A., Dewey, J., Schneider, F., Dickerman, W., Stephan, A. S., Sorenson, H., & Hart, J. K. (1938) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2084758 · Cited by 6,905
The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies.
Baber, Z., Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076669 · Cited by 4,406
The New Meaning of Educational Change
Fullan, M. (2001) · doi:10.4324/9780203986561 · Cited by 4,373
Cited by
A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: a meta-analysis study
Zhang, L., & Ma, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728 · Cited by 455
PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development
Edström, K., & Kolmos, A. (2014) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2014.895703 · Cited by 276
Self-citationResponse strategies for curriculum change in engineering
Kolmos, A., Hadgraft, R. G., & Holgaard, J. E. (2016) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-015-9319-y · Cited by 171
Self-citationComputing Education Research Today
Fincher, S. A., Tenenberg, J., Dorn, B., Hundhausen, C., McCartney, R., & Murphy, L. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.003 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Kolmos, A., & de Graaff, E.
- Venue
- Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2014-02-10
- Pages
- 141-160
- OpenAlex
- W2593100137
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 32.12
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning in Engineering Education: Merging Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9781139013451.012
- The paper
- Kolmos, A., & de Graaff, E. (2014). Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning in Engineering Education: Merging Models. Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139013451.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.