The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts
Abstract
This paper intoduces new principles for the design and use of letter charts for the measurement of visual acuity. It is advocated that the test task should be essentially the same at each size level on the chart. Such standardization of the test task requires the use of letters of equal legibility, the same number of letters on each row, and uniform between-letter and between-row spacing. It is also advocated that, combined with the test task standardization, there should be a logarithmic progression of letter size. Charts incorporating these design features have been made. These charts facilitate the use of nonstandard testing distances which might be used when there is low visual acuity, when examination room layout prevents testing at the standard distance, or when it is necessary to validate visual acuity scores or detect malingering. Adjusting the visual acuity score according to the chosen testing distance is simplified by the use of logarithmic scaling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Risk Factors for Hip Fracture in White Women
Cummings, S. R., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W. S., Stone, K., Fox, K. M., Ensrud, K. E., Cauley, J., Black, D., & Vogt, T. M. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199503233321202 · Cited by 3,595
Chakravarthy, U., Harding, S. P., Rogers, C. A., Downes, S. M., Lotery, A. J., Culliford, L. A., & Reeves, B. C. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61501-9 · Cited by 748
Is grip strength a useful single marker of frailty?
Syddall, H., Cooper, C., Martin, F., Briggs, R., & Aihie Sayer, A. (2003) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afg111 · Cited by 564
Is Diabetes Associated With Cognitive Impairment and Cognitive Decline Among Older Women?
Gregg, E. W. (2000) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.160.2.174 · Cited by 521
Arora, N. K., Nair, M. K. C., Gulati, S., Deshmukh, V., Mohapatra, A., Mishra, D., Patel, V., Pandey, R. M., Das, B. C., Divan, G., et al. (2018) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002615 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Bailey, I. L., & Lovie, J. E.
- Venue
- American journal of optometry and physiological optic
- Published
- 1976-11-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 740-745
- ISSN
- 0093-7002 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1490819121
- Cited by
- 1,407
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2330-9512.1976.tb02218.x
- The paper
- Bailey, I. L., & Lovie, J. E. (1976). New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts. American journal of optometry and physiological optic. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2330-9512.1976.tb02218.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.