Discrete‐trial training performance of behavior interventionists with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic replication and extension
Abstract
Further research is needed on strategies to improve employment outcomes for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We replicated and extended prior research by examining the acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of discrete‐trial training (DTT) performance of adults with ASD who were interested in careers as behavior technicians. Three participants received training on how to implement DTT with children and we assessed the maintenance and generalization of DTT performance in the absence of feedback. Results indicated that procedural integrity generalized across children and targets and maintained for 6 to 17 session days without feedback. Results have implications for the successful employment of individuals with ASD as behavior technicians and for future research on strategies to enhance their performance on the job.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Autistic adults may be uniquely positioned to serve as intervention providers.
“Autistic adults may be uniquely positioned to serve as intervention providers (e.g. Hillman et al., 2020)”
From Neurodiversity and Autism Intervention: Reconciling Perspectives Through a Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Hillman et al., 2020
Cites
Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Howlin, P., & Moss, P. (2012) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674371205700502 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Factors impacting employment for people with autism spectrum disorder: A scoping review
Scott, M., Milbourn, B., Falkmer, M., Black, M., Bӧlte, S., Halladay, A., Lerner, M., Taylor, J. L., & Girdler, S. (2019) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361318787789 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Outcomes in adults with autism spectrum disorders: a historical perspective
Henninger, N. A., & Taylor, J. L. (2013) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361312441266 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schuck, R. K., Tagavi, D. M., Baiden, K. M. P., Dwyer, P., Williams, Z. J., Osuna, A., Ferguson, E. F., Jimenez Muñoz, M., Poyser, S. K., Johnson, J. F., et al. (2022) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05316-x · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Briggs, A. M., Zohr, S. J., & Harvey, O. B. (2024) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.1024 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hillman, C. B., Lerman, D. C., & Kosel, M. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Houston - Clear Lake (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lerman, Dorothea C.
- ORCID
- Lerman, Dorothea C.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-07-31
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 374-388
- ISSN
- 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3703
- OpenAlex
- W3046774517
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, discrete trial training, employment of autistic people, procedural integrity
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Achievement, Adult, Child, Feedback, Generalization, Psychological, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review