Cited by 267Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDisability Education and EmploymentFamily and Disability Support Research

Outcomes in adults with autism spectrum disorders: a historical perspective

Open access
Henninger, Natalie A., Taylor, Julie Lounds·2013·Autism

Abstract

In this review, we examine the ways in which researchers have defined successful adult outcomes for individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) from the first systematic follow-up reports to the present day. The earliest outcome studies used vague and unreliable outcome criteria, and institutionalization was a common marker of poor outcomes. In the past decade, researchers have begun to standardize the measurement of adult outcomes with specific criteria based on friendships, employment, and living arrangements. Although nearly all of these studies have agreed that the majority of adults with ASD have poor outcomes, evolving concepts of what it means to be an adult could have an impact on outcomes measured. For example, some researchers have suggested that taking into account the person-environment fit could reveal a more optimistic picture of outcomes for these adults. Suggestions for future research are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361312441266

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analyses suggest that across the lifespan, subjective QOL tends to be lower among individuals with ASD compared to typically-developing peers, but is often more positive than indicators of objective QOL.

    “Meta-analysis have suggested that across the lifespan, subjective QOL tends to be lower among individuals with ASD compared to typically-developing peers 228 , but is often more positive than indicators of objective QOL 223,229 .”

    From Autism spectrum disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [229]

    The 'Move Toward Specificity and Reliability' section reports more positive person–environment and caregiver-rated well-being results than outcomes based on objective criteria, supporting the comparison attached to this citation. But those ratings are not individuals’ own reports of subjective quality of life, and the example concerns adults rather than establishing that this pattern often holds across the lifespan. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henninger, N. A., & Taylor, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
Autism
Published
2012-08-21
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
103-116
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2109872026
Cited by
267
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10
FWCI
8.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH092598)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD015052, P30 HD-15052)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, adult outcomes, outcome measurement, institutionalization, employment, friendship, living arrangements, person-environment fit
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Employment, Humans, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Friends, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review