Cited by 8Pregnancy and Medication ImpactComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesPhytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications

Safety of Chinese herbal medicines during pregnancy

Liang, Bo, Li, Lu, Tang, Ling Yin, Wu, Qi, Wu, Xiao Ke, Wang, Chi Chiu·2015·Journal of Applied Toxicology

Abstract

Miscarriage and infertility have long been public concerns due to the mental and physical suffering they bring to potential parents. There is a strong need for effective and affordable treatments. Chinese herbal medicines (CHMs) have been shown to be effective for preventing miscarriage and treating infertility; however, due to the limited knowledge of their pharmacological mechanisms and unknown potential toxicity, their use has been restricted. This paper reviews 24 clinical trials of CHMs to prevent miscarriage and treat infertility. Most of these studies did not meet the requirements of randomized controlled trials. Even when using quality assessments based on the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale to assess the quality of non‐randomized studies, most studies did not meet the requirements. The reviewed papers were evaluated for maternal and embryonic adverse effects, including those in animal experiments. Slight maternal effects were noted, with some reports of severe toxic effects of CHMs for preventing miscarriage and severe adverse maternal effects of CHMs used for infertility. Owing to the poor quality of the randomized controlled clinical trials and the limited number of studies, it is not possible to draw a conclusion. From animal studies, for all three gestational periods, growth delay and congenital anomalies were the most commonly recorded adverse effects. However, baseline toxicological data and detailed mechanisms are still lacking. To gain a better understanding of the potential toxic effects of CHMs, additional high‐quality randomized controlled trials should be conducted, and high‐throughput in vitro screening method for baseline data should be considered. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jat.3108

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, B., Li, L., Tang, L. Y., Wu, Q., Wu, X. K., & Wang, C. C.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong
  • Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Chi Chiu
Venue
Journal of Applied Toxicology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-02-07
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
447-458
ISSN
  • 0260-437X (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1263
OpenAlex
W2168537555
Cited by
8
References
76
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
Keywords
Chinese herbal medicine, pregnancy safety, miscarriage prevention, infertility treatment, maternal toxicity, embryotoxicity, congenital malformations, growth retardation, animal toxicity studies, clinical trial quality, in vitro screening
MeSH terms
Animals, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Drugs, Chinese Herbal, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Toxicity Tests, Models, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review