Cited by 60Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesPregnancy and Medication ImpactComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

Safety evaluation of commonly used Chinese herbal medicines during pregnancy in mice

Wang, Chi Chiu, Li, Lu, Tang, Ling Yin, Leung, Ping Chung·2012·Human Reproduction

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unclear how safe the use of Chinese herbal medicine is during pregnancy and if the herbal medicines do any harm to pregnancy, embryo-fetal development and prenatal and post-natal growth. A large-scale preclinical study was conducted to detect the adverse effects of Chinese herbal medicines during pregnancy. METHODS: Twenty of the most commonly used Chinese herbal medicines prescribed for pregnancy were selected and the crude extract was administered to pregnant mice at clinical doses during five different gestational stages, namely post-implantation, gastrulation, organogenesis, maturation and whole gestation periods. Maternal effects on side effects, weight loss, litter reduction, implantation failure and fetal resorption and perinatal effects on growth restriction, developmental delay, congenital malformations and post-natal mortality were determined. RESULTS: Adverse pregnancy outcomes were commonly observed after maternal exposure to the herbal medicines, particularly during early pregnancy. Major events included maternal and perinatal mortality were recorded. Maternal weight gain, embryo growth and post-natal weight gain were significantly decreased. Fetal resorption and skeletal malformations were significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS: Reproductive toxicity of Chinese herbal medicines commonly used during pregnancy was identified in mice. Caution should be taken in the clinical use of herbal medicines during pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/des180

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, C. C., Li, L., Tang, L. Y., & Leung, P. C.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Wang, Chi Chiu
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2012-05-30
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
2448-2456
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2115367106
Cited by
60
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research Institute
  • University of Hong Kong
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
Chinese herbal medicine, pregnancy, reproductive toxicity, pregnancy stage, fetal resorption, skeletal deformities, congenital malformations, perinatal mortality, growth restriction, maternal toxicity, herbal medicine safety
MeSH terms
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced, Animals, Drugs, Chinese Herbal, Female, Fetal Resorption, Medicine, Chinese Traditional, Embryo Implantation, Plants, Medicinal, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy, Animal, Maternal Exposure, Fetal Weight, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review