Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Retention and activity of BMP‐2 in hyaluronic acid‐based scaffolds in vitro

Open access
Kim, Hyun D., Valentini, Robert F.·2002·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

Abstract

Bone morphogenetic protein‐2 (BMP‐2) delivered in a suitable implantable matrix has the potential to repair local skeletal defects by inducing new bone formation from undifferentiated plurpotent stem cells resident in host tissue. In this study, we examined in vitro the potential of a derivatized hyaluronic acid (Hyaff‐11) scaffold as a delivery vehicle for recombinant human BMP‐2 (rhBMP‐2) in bone and cartilage repair therapies. Hyaff‐11 scaffolds were fabricated using a phase inversion/particulate leaching method and soak‐loaded with rhBMP‐2. In vitro release kinetics of rhBMP‐2, demonstrated using enzyme‐linked immunosorbant assay and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assay revealed a slow, sustained rhBMP‐2 release during 28 days, with a cumulative release of 31.82% of the initial rhBMP‐2 loaded. rhBMP‐2 was released in bioactive form as demonstrated by ALP induction of pluripotent cell line, C3H10T1/2 (T1/2), down the osteoblast lineage when incubated with the release supernatants. rhBMP‐2 retention in Hyaff‐11 scaffolds was greater than that from collagen gels, which released most of the initially loaded rhBMP‐2 by 14 days. rhBMP‐2‐loaded Hyaff‐11 scaffolds were also seeded with T1/2 cells and evaluated at 3, 7, 14, and 28 days for viability and expression of osteoblast phenotype. Cells remained viable throughout the study and expressed a time‐ and dose‐dependent ALP and osteocalcin expression in the rhBMP‐2 groups. Based on these observations, Hyaff‐11 scaffolds may be suitable delivery systems for rhBMP‐2 in bone/cartilage repair because of their ability to retain rhBMP‐2, release low levels of bioactive rhBMP‐2 to the local environment in a sustained manner, and stimulate differentiation of pluripotent stem cells. © 2001 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 59: 573–584, 2002

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.10011

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Kim, H. D., & Valentini, R. F.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12-05
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
573-584
ISSN
  • 0021-9304 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4636
OpenAlex
W2088773289
Cited by
185
References
1
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retention and activity of BMP‐2 in hyaluronic acid‐based scaffolds in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.10011
The paper
Kim, H. D., & Valentini, R. F. (2002). Retention and activity of BMP‐2 in hyaluronic acid‐based scaffolds in vitro. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.